Viewpoint: ‘So-called environmentalists can eat crow, transgenic corn proves a win for science and the public’

Credit: WetMethanol via CC-BY-SA-4.0
Credit: WetMethanol via CC-BY-SA-4.0
In 2020, storms caused an estimated $12 billion in damage, including in Iowa, where a giant amount of America’s corn is grown. Yet only 16 percent of the state’s corn was ruined.

The reason was science; the corn had been genetically engineered to be shorter. That meant it needed less water, and resulted in less environmental strain, plus shorter stalks meant less risk from wind.

Over the protestations of environmentalists, USDA has already approved this transgenic corn, the final round of field trials happened this growing season on 12,000 hectares. Yet environmentalists should not protest at all. Corn is a grass, it was only ever genetically engineered to make cows grow better – it was poisonous to humans in its natural form. Add water to a poison grass and process it and you create food. Only later did humans then engineer it for direct human consumption also and then want to make it bigger and bigger to use less space. Now science is reversing that last part, by making it smaller but producing the same amount of food.

Image: Bayer. No, they don’t give us any money, though they should, so keep quiet, organic industry toadies.

It is a win for the public, for science, and for farmers. The only losers are activist groups who hate science – and other horror movie scriptwriters. You can’t get lost in short corn fields, after all.

Hank Campbell is the founder and editor of Science 2.0. Hank is also the author of  Science Left Behind. Follow Hank on X @HankCampbell

A version of this article was originally posted at Science 2.0 and has been reposted here with permission. Any reposting should credit the original author and provide links to both the GLP and the original article. Find Science 2.0 on X @science_2.0

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}
screenshot at  pm

Are pesticide residues on food something to worry about?

In 1962, Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring drew attention to pesticides and their possible dangers to humans, birds, mammals and the ...
glp menu logo outlined

Newsletter Subscription

* indicates required
Email Lists
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.