The perils of neurocentrism

Face recognition
An fMRI scan showing facial recognition. CREDIT: NIH, via Wikimedia Commons.

The following is an edited excerpt from a review of Brainwashed by Sally Satel and Scott O. Lilienfeld.

By measuring and analyzing the bits of color seen in brain scans (functional magnetic resonance imaging, fMRI) and making inferences, scientists can learn that one part of your brain lights up when you wrestle with a decision; that another is exercised when you shop online; or that a third part makes you fall in love. (One branding expert used fMRI data to claim that Apple users literally adore their devices.)

The issue with fMRI and other neuroscience techniques, argue psychiatrist Sally Satel and clinical psychologist Scott Lilienfeld, is “neurocentrism,” or “the view that human experience and behavior can be best explained from the predominant or even exclusive perspective of the brain.” In their concise and well-researched book, they offer a reasonable and eloquent critique of this fashionable delusion, chiding the premature or unnecessary application of brain science to commerce, psychiatry, the law and ethics.

Read the full review here: Lite-Brite Phrenology

Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
GLP Podcasts
Infographic: Here’s where GM crops are grown around the world today

Infographic: Here’s where GM crops are grown around the world today

Do you know where biotech crops are grown in the world? This updated ISAAA infographics show where biotech crops were ...
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
glp menu logo outlined

Newsletter Subscription

* indicates required
Email Lists
Send this to a friend