It’s hard to appreciate scientific facts. Throw emotion and/or politics into the debate, and science is not going to win.
This fall, Washington voters will decide whether genetically engineered food will get a label. I’ve rooted around, looking for solid scientific evidence that the label will provide meaningful information. I came up empty, except for a group of scientists in the American Academy of Environmental Medicine, who claim “there is ample evidence of probable harm” caused by genetically modified organisms.
But again, this could be a case of the science sounding right because it sounds good.
Read the full, original story here: “Could labeling GMOs do harm?”
