First day testimony in landmark Western Australia organic-GMO row court case

figri

On the first day of a landmark Australian Supreme Court case, lawyers for Kojonup farmer Steve Marsh claimed Michael Baxter had failed in his duty of care to ensure his GM crop did not affect their client’s property. Mr Marsh’s farm lost most of its certified organic status in 2010 after the alleged contamination and he is suing Mr Baxter in a case that has gained worldwide attention. Mr Marsh is seeking about $85,000 in damages and a ban that indefinitely prevents Mr Baxter from planting and harvesting GM crops.

A key aspect of the case will hinge on whether the method used by Mr Baxter to harvest his GM canola was negligent. Mr Baxter employed a harvesting technique known as “swathing”, which involves piling crops into so-called wind rows to dry them out.

Defence counsel Patricia Cahill argued Mr Baxter should not be liable for the loss of Mr Marsh’s organic certification. Ms Cahill said that under national standards and those of Mr Marsh’s organic certifier, the National Association for Sustainable Agriculture Australia, his farm should not have been decertified.

Read full original article: GM case fuels tension

Outbreak
Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Genetics Unzipped
Infographic: How dangerous COVID mutant strains develop

Infographic: How dangerous COVID mutant strains develop

Sometime in 2019, probably in China, SARS CoV-2 figured out a way to interact with a specific "spike" on the ...
Untitled

Philip Njemanze: Leading African anti-GMO activist claims Gates Foundation destroying Nigeria

Nigerian anti-GMO activist, physician, and inventor pushes anti-gay and anti-GMO ...

Most Popular

News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
glp menu logo outlined

Newsletter Subscription

Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend