Public mislead about organics: GM and conventional food as safe, healthy, nutritious

The verdict in the Australia courts rejecting the claim of an organic farmer than his GM-farming neighbor was “contaminating” his crops will hopefully prompt a rethink about the alleged benefits of organic food.

The dramatic growth in recent years in the sale of organic foods is attributable to the fact that many consumers believe organic food is safer, more nutritious and healthy. Safety is expressed in terms of concerns about pesticides, hormones, antibiotics and GM food. Since organic food is objectively no safer, more nutritious or healthier, it is clear the public has been grossly misled. That leads to the question, can the public be convinced of its error?

In fairness, most members of the public are sensible enough to know that organic food is nothing special. Otherwise it would not be limited to the small percentage of the market it holds. Quality is often variable and the price is usually higher. But there is a tendency, when the price of organic food drops to match that of conventional food, to choose the organic. It is given the benefit of the doubt.

We need to hear more about how organic food is often fertilised with manure, leading to increased instances of food poisoning. We need to hear about the natural pesticides that have evolved in certain varieties of organic fruit and vegetables which, while probably no more hazardous than synthetic pesticides, have never been tested. We need to hear more about the environmental harm caused by tillage, which is used to grow many organic crops. We need to see comparisons between organic and conventionally produced food, showing there is no nutritional or health difference. I could go on.

Whether you believe in free markets or fair markets, deception should not be a part of it. The organic industry, which is founded on deception, deserves to be exposed. Losing the case in WA, on which its supporters had such high expectations, represents a serious defeat. Now might be a good time to follow up with some truth telling.

Read the full, original article: Time to tell the truth about organics

Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped
Video: Test everyone – Slovakia goes its own way to control COVID

Video: Test everyone – Slovakia goes its own way to control COVID

As Europe sees record coronavirus cases and deaths, Slovakia is testing its entire adult population. WSJ's Drew Hinshaw explains how ...
mag insects image superjumbo v

Disaster interrupted: Which farming system better preserves insect populations: Organic or conventional?

A three-year run of fragmentary Armageddon-like studies had primed the journalism pumps and settled the media framing about the future ...
dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

The media call it the “Insect Apocalypse”. In the past three years, the phrase has become an accepted truth of ...
globalmethanebudget globalcarbonproject cropped x

Infographic: Cows cause climate change? Agriculture scientist says ‘belching bovines’ get too much blame

A recent interview by Caroline Stocks, a UK journalist who writes about food, agriculture and the environment, of air quality ...
organic hillside sweet corn x

Organic v conventional using GMOs: Which is the more sustainable farming?

Many consumers spend more for organic food to avoid genetically modified products in part because they believe that “industrial agriculture” ...
benjamin franklin x

Are most GMO safety studies funded by industry?

The assertion that biotech companies do the research and the government just signs off on it is false ...

Environmental Working Group: EWG challenges safety of GMOs, food pesticide residues

Known by some as the "Environmental Worrying Group," EWG lobbies for tighter GMO legislation and famously puts out annual "dirty dozen" list of fruits and ...
m hansen

Michael Hansen: Architect of Consumers Union ongoing anti-GMO campaign

Michael K. Hansen (born 1956) is thought by critics to be the prime mover behind the ongoing campaign against agricultural biotechnology at Consumer Reports. He is an ...
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend