To feed hungry world, is the future of agriculture a battle between organics and GMOs?

greenglobe

Many countries in the developing world are likely to bear the ecological brunt of climate change and population increase. Meanwhile, the controversy over biotechnology rages in India, Costa Rica, the Philippines and Uganda, among many countries.

Many organizations in the developing world point to biotechnology as the answer to feeding the nine billion people that the UN expects will fill the planet by 2050; others cite low-input small farms as the solution. In the latest issue of National Geographic, writers Craig Cutler and Tim Folger address these challenges in “The Next Great Green Revolution.”

The United Nations forecasts that by 2050 the world’s population will grow by more than two billion people. Half will be born in sub-Saharan Africa, and another 30 percent in South and Southeast Asia. Those regions are also where the effects of climate change—drought, heat waves, extreme weather generally—are expected to hit hardest. Last March the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change warned that the world’s food supply is already jeopardized.

This isn’t the first time that scary predictions of a hungry future have loomed over the global South. In the 1960s, Stanford biologist Paul Ehrlich (now president of the Center for Conservation Biology) predicted that famines would kill hundreds of millions of people in India. Nobel laureate Norman Borlaug, who died September 12, 2009, was a major player in defusing this so-called “population bomb”, by increasing wheat yields.

Through selective breeding, Norman Borlaug, an American biologist, created a dwarf variety of wheat that put most of its energy into edible kernels rather than long, inedible stems. The result: more grain per acre. Similar work at the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) in the Philippines dramatically improved the productivity of the grain that feeds nearly half the world. From the 1960s through the 1990s, yields of rice and wheat in Asia doubled. Even as the continent’s population increased by 60 percent, grain prices fell, the average Asian consumed nearly a third more calories, and the poverty rate was cut in half.

Rice is the most important food crop in the world, providing more energy to humanity than any other food source. Rice yields have more than tripled since 1961, keeping up with Asia’s growing population. JASON TREAT, NGM STAFF. SOURCES: JANELLE JUNG, IRRI; FAOSTAT

To keep doing that between now and 2050, we’ll need another green revolution. There are two competing visions of how it will happen. 

Groups such as the Consortium of Indian Farmers Association (CIFA)the Biotechnology Society of Nigeria and AfricaBio believe that biotechnology solutions can help with poverty and hunger in the global South. Nompumelelo H Obokoh, CEO of AfricaBio, maintains that “[b]iotechnology, while not the complete answer to food insecurity at the household level in South Africa, can help to ensure that nobody goes to bed on an empty stomach,” and interviews small farmers in South Africa about their experiences with GM crops.  

The cassava plants in this petri dish have been genetically engineered to resist brown streak virus, a disease that’s spreading across sub-Saharan Africa, where cassava is a staple for 250 million people. Field tests began last spring in Uganda. Only four African countries allow the planting of genetically modified crops.  Image by Craig Cutler.
The cassava plants in this petri dish have been genetically engineered to resist brown streak virus, a disease that’s spreading across sub-Saharan Africa, where cassava is a staple for 250 million people. Field tests began last spring in Uganda. Only four African countries allow the planting of genetically modified crops. Image by Craig Cutler.

The Philippine Rice Research Institute works on developing transgenic Golden Rice to help fight nutrient deficiency, especially in children.

South African scientists led by Dionne Shepherd are working on a marketable strain of transgenic maize resistant to maize streak virus. This is especially notable because maize streak virus is endemic to sub-Saharan Africa. It could be the first African-produced GMO, created with African problems in mind. Meanwhile, scientists in Uganda are testing GM cassava resistant to brown streak virus.

Groups like the African Centre for Biosafety have another vision, one that focuses on reducing the input of chemical fertilizers and pesticides. “We are outraged that South Africa – the only country in the world to permit the cultivation of genetically modified staple – continues to do so despite a large and growing body of scientific evidence pointing towards severe potential health risks of consuming GM crops, including maize,” said Mariam Mayet, Director of the African Centre for Biosafety, in a recent article.  

Food Sovereignty Ghana believes that problems in food security are the result of “the neo-liberal agenda of the imperialists…  which have the focus on marginalising the small family farm agriculture that continues to feed over 80% of Africa and replacing them with governance structures, agreements and practices that depend on and promote unsustainable and inequitable international trade and give power to remote and unaccountable corporations.”

The GM crops that exist are safe, and provide numerous benefits to the environment. They also provide a valuable tool for innovative problem solving. It’s valuable to continue to research them, and use them. But no one is suggesting that we abandon other avenues of research. For example, traditional breeding seems to be the best solution for drought tolerance right now (though I would hasten to add that I support continued research into drought-tolerant GM crops).

Planting GM crops can also be beneficial to small farmers. But not all small farmers are the same. Some can’t afford fertilizer, much less high-end seed. And good stewardship of GM crops includes planting them correctly, which may involve information exchange and infrastructure that is not available to small farmers.

Cutler and Folger end their report with a plea for coexistence. Indeed, even biotech corporations like Monsanto stress the coexistence of GM and organic crops. So where is the controversy? Most of us already seem to be following the middle way.

Sunflower image by Craig Cutler
Sunflower image by Craig Cutler

It’s not choosing one type of knowledge—low-tech versus high-tech, organic versus GM—once and for all. There’s more than one way to increase yields or to stop a whitefly. “Organic farming can be the right approach in some areas,” says Monsanto executive Mark Edge. “By no means do we think that GM crops are the solution for all the problems in Africa.” Since the first green revolution, says Robert Zeigler, ecological science has advanced along with genetics. IRRI uses those advances too.

 Additional resources:

 

Outbreak
Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Genetics Unzipped
Infographic: How dangerous COVID mutant strains develop

Infographic: How dangerous COVID mutant strains develop

Sometime in 2019, probably in China, SARS CoV-2 figured out a way to interact with a specific "spike" on the ...
Untitled

Philip Njemanze: Leading African anti-GMO activist claims Gates Foundation destroying Nigeria

Nigerian anti-GMO activist, physician, and inventor pushes anti-gay and anti-GMO ...
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
glp menu logo outlined

Newsletter Subscription

Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend