Australian GM farmer fighting ‘contamination’ appeal says he received no financial backing from Monsanto

A landmark GM contamination now unfolding in the supreme court of Western Australia has for now swung in favour of an organic farmer facing a huge legal bill, while his adversary must reveal if he was backed by Monsanto or an industry group.

Steve Marsh’s bid last year to sue Kojonup neighbour and former childhood friend Michael Baxter for allegedly ‘contaminating’ his organic farm after cross pollination between the two farms occurred was unsuccessful.

Marsh had sought $85,000 in damages, claiming he lost organic certification for more than half his farm because Baxter’s genetically modified canola had blown onto his land. Instead, Marsh was ordered by the court to pay costs of about $804,000 after the court ruled in favor

But the judges ordered Baxter to provide information about his trial costs, specifically any financial arrangements between him and Monsanto and the Pastoralists and Graziers Association.

That was because Baxter might enjoy a windfall from the award of costs if Monsanto or the PGA had helped pay his legal bills for the trial.

Under the indemnity principle, Marsh should have to pay Baxter only costs that came out of his own pocket.

Asked whether Monsanto had provided financial support, Bradley said: “I can’t tell you that because that’s confidential, but all will be disclosed in the document filed with the court.”

Baxter said he was not disappointed with the decision. “We’re feeling great. We don’t have any problems,” he said. “We respect the decision of the court and we’d only be disappointed if we thought it was wrong.

Read full, original article: GM crop farmer told to reveal if he was backed by Monsanto in legal battle

Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped
Video: Test everyone – Slovakia goes its own way to control COVID

Video: Test everyone – Slovakia goes its own way to control COVID

As Europe sees record coronavirus cases and deaths, Slovakia is testing its entire adult population. WSJ's Drew Hinshaw explains how ...
mag insects image superjumbo v

Disaster interrupted: Which farming system better preserves insect populations: Organic or conventional?

A three-year run of fragmentary Armageddon-like studies had primed the journalism pumps and settled the media framing about the future ...
dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

The media call it the “Insect Apocalypse”. In the past three years, the phrase has become an accepted truth of ...
globalmethanebudget globalcarbonproject cropped x

Infographic: Cows cause climate change? Agriculture scientist says ‘belching bovines’ get too much blame

A recent interview by Caroline Stocks, a UK journalist who writes about food, agriculture and the environment, of air quality ...
organic hillside sweet corn x

Organic v conventional using GMOs: Which is the more sustainable farming?

Many consumers spend more for organic food to avoid genetically modified products in part because they believe that “industrial agriculture” ...
benjamin franklin x

Are most GMO safety studies funded by industry?

The assertion that biotech companies do the research and the government just signs off on it is false ...

Environmental Working Group: EWG challenges safety of GMOs, food pesticide residues

Known by some as the "Environmental Worrying Group," EWG lobbies for tighter GMO legislation and famously puts out annual "dirty dozen" list of fruits and ...
m hansen

Michael Hansen: Architect of Consumers Union ongoing anti-GMO campaign

Michael K. Hansen (born 1956) is thought by critics to be the prime mover behind the ongoing campaign against agricultural biotechnology at Consumer Reports. He is an ...
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend