What is war good for? Reproductive success and evolution, according to new research

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis. 

What motivates war? Ideology and theology and, in cultures of honor, answering an affront. Years ago, someone in clan A accused someone in clan B of stealing someone’s favorite camel, and it’s been retributive fighting ever since. In most wars, of course, material rewards—land and plundered goods—also have been a major motivation.

Evolutionary biologists take a longer view. They pose the basic Darwinian question: Does success in warfare enhance reproductive success, increasing the number of copies of genes that a man passes to future generations? Spectacular examples of this certainly exist. Ibn Saud, who unified Saudi Arabia in 1932 after a series of conquests, has thousands of descendants; tens of millions of humans appear to carry the genes of Genghis Khan.

But is there more systematic evidence that high rates of participation in warfare enhance reproductive success? With the exception of a controversial 1988 study of an Amazonian tribe, the answer is no. That is why research conducted by Harvard scientists Luke Glowacki and Richard Wrangham , writing in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, is so interesting.

The authors studied the Nyangatom, nomadic pastoralists living on the Ethiopian/South Sudanese/Kenyan border. Like many traditional pastoralists, the Nyangatom spend a lot of time raiding other groups’ cattle (or, depending on whose side you’re taking, reclaiming their own stolen cattle).

Read full, original post: Do the Genes of Warriors Win the Evolution Battle?

Outbreak
Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped
Video: Test everyone – Slovakia goes its own way to control COVID

Video: Test everyone – Slovakia goes its own way to control COVID

As Europe sees record coronavirus cases and deaths, Slovakia is testing its entire adult population. WSJ's Drew Hinshaw explains how ...
mag insects image superjumbo v

Disaster interrupted: Which farming system better preserves insect populations: Organic or conventional?

A three-year run of fragmentary Armageddon-like studies had primed the journalism pumps and settled the media framing about the future ...
dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

The media call it the “Insect Apocalypse”. In the past three years, the phrase has become an accepted truth of ...
globalmethanebudget globalcarbonproject cropped x

Infographic: Cows cause climate change? Agriculture scientist says ‘belching bovines’ get too much blame

A recent interview by Caroline Stocks, a UK journalist who writes about food, agriculture and the environment, of air quality ...
organic hillside sweet corn x

Organic v conventional using GMOs: Which is the more sustainable farming?

Many consumers spend more for organic food to avoid genetically modified products in part because they believe that “industrial agriculture” ...
benjamin franklin x

Are most GMO safety studies funded by industry?

The assertion that biotech companies do the research and the government just signs off on it is false ...
favicon

Environmental Working Group: EWG challenges safety of GMOs, food pesticide residues

Known by some as the "Environmental Worrying Group," EWG lobbies for tighter GMO legislation and famously puts out annual "dirty dozen" list of fruits and ...
m hansen

Michael Hansen: Architect of Consumers Union ongoing anti-GMO campaign

Michael K. Hansen (born 1956) is thought by critics to be the prime mover behind the ongoing campaign against agricultural biotechnology at Consumer Reports. He is an ...
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend