Boulder County’s ban of GMOs on public land based on ‘values’ not public health concerns

This article or excerpt is included in the GLP’s daily curated selection of ideologically diverse news, opinion and analysis of biotechnology innovation.

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis.

Recently. . . we reversed the 2011 policy that allowed the planting of genetically-modified organism (or GMO) corn and sugar beets on county-owned croplands, and directed staff to develop a phase-out plan . . . Given the intense community interest and divided opinion on this topic, we want to explain why.

Some argue transitioning away from GMOs is anti-science, given that many studies have shown no definitive public health risk. Let us be clear: Our decision was not based on the belief that all genetic engineering is in and of itself harmful. Indeed, in some cases, benefits, e.g., drought resistance, could outweigh potential risks.

At the heart of our decision was a key policy question: Should public lands be managed to achieve public benefits commensurate with the significant investment of public tax dollars that acquired those lands? Or should the county let private lessees farm our 16,000 acres of public croplands however they like?

Related article:  To revive monarch butterflies, plant milkweed in yards and on wild lands, study says

We concluded that our taxpayer-owned agricultural open space does play a distinct role from private farmland and should be managed according to Boulder County’s values. . . . Boulder County should similarly strive to be a national leader in sustainable agriculture. In our view, the current GMO cropping system does not achieve this high standard.

Our concerns are about supporting a cropping system involving seeds genetically engineered to partner with toxic pesticides. Counter to integrated pesticide management, which uses chemicals only as a last resort, these GMOs guarantee continued use of synthetic chemicals, particularly glyphosate.

Read full, original post: Elise Jones and Deb Gardner: GMO phase-out is faithful to Boulder County values

Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped
sperm swim

Video: Sperm are ‘spinners not swimmers’—because they are lopsided

Research by fertility scientists in the UK and Mexico challenges the accepted view of how sperm “swim”, suggesting that it ...
mag insects image superjumbo v

Disaster interrupted: Which farming system better preserves insect populations: Organic or conventional?

A three-year run of fragmentary Armageddon-like studies had primed the journalism pumps and settled the media framing about the future ...
dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

The media call it the “Insect Apocalypse”. In the past three years, the phrase has become an accepted truth of ...
breastfeeding bed x facebook x

Infographic: We know breastfeeding helps children. Now we know it helps mothers too

When a woman becomes pregnant, her risk of type 2 diabetes increases for the rest of her life, perhaps because ...
biotechnology worker x

Can GMOs rescue threatened plants and crops?

Some scientists and ecologists argue that humans are in the midst of an "extinction crisis" — the sixth wave of ...
food globe x

Are GMOs necessary to feed the world?

Experts estimate that agricultural production needs to roughly double in the coming decades. How can that be achieved? ...
eating gmo corn on the cob x

Are GMOs safe?

In 2015, 15 scientists and activists issued a statement, "No Scientific consensus on GMO safety," in the journal Environmental Sciences ...
Screen Shot at PM

Charles Benbrook: Agricultural economist and consultant for the organic industry and anti-biotechnology advocacy groups

Independent scientists rip Benbrook's co-authored commentary in New England Journal calling for reassessment of dangers of all GMO crops and herbicides ...
Screen Shot at PM

ETC Group: ‘Extreme’ biotechnology critic campaigns against synthetic biology and other forms of ‘extreme genetic engineering’

The ETC Group is an international environmental non-governmental organization (NGO) based in Canada whose stated purpose is to monitor "the impact of emerging technologies and ...
Share via
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend