Gender, sex and identity: Sports’ ruling bodies struggle to draw lines to ensure fairness for all

unnamed
Image Credit: SAEED KHAN / AFP

The case of Caster Semenya is as fascinating as it is multi-faceted. And while the debate can be endless due to the multitude of factors, the position one ends up taking really pivots on just a single point: how gender is defined.

Is the two-time Olympic champion sprinter a woman? Is “she” really a man? Is her biological makeup a combination of both genders? That all depends on, yes, the definition of gender.

[Editor’s note: This is the first in a three-part series on the complicated and fluid issue of gender and sexual identity in elite sports. Read part two and part three.]

To that end, the governing body of global track and field has determined that since its organization exists – at least for the meantime – only in a two-gender world, the bottom line is it must have a way of separating the men’s division from the women’s. And that, it has determined, must be done using one metric: testosterone.

Specifically, it says, a measurement over a certain level requires a runner to compete with men (in certain, shorter races, because those are the ones where testosterone has been shown to have the greatest effect).

Moreover, since the 27-year-old South African has a form of testes, which produces testosterone in levels that exceed those produced by women athletes, the International Association of Athletics Federations has ruled that Semenya, and athletes like her, must either reduce their high level using hormone treatment or compete against men in those races.

And most importantly, since she has a chromosomal makeup that is not purely XX (female) but one that is however-partially XY (male), when you get right down to it, it makes sense for the IAAF to determine that’s where the line separating the two genders belongs. In essence, if you have any “Y” in your chromosomes – as far as racing is concerned – you can’t be considered a female.

Following the IAAF’s decision, which is scheduled to take effect in November, Semenya announced in June that she would challenge the new rule in the Court of Arbitration for Sport, in Switzerland, where international sports cases are adjudicated.

Related article:  Evolution, the human diet and the meat vs. plant conundrum

“I just want to run naturally, the way I was born,” Semenya said recently after the rule was announced. “It is not fair that I am told I must change. It is not fair that people question who I am.”

Fairness, an excellent issue.

Yes, she has a firm, defensible belief that she’s not being treated fairly. The two-time 800-meter champion is being told to medically alter her biology, her natural body, if she still wants to compete in that race. But by the same token, is it fair that she has some form of testes – an anatomical advantage, which produces more testosterone – that her competitors do not? No, that’s not fair to the other women competing against Semenya, a constituency that IAAF must represent as well and one far bigger than a single runner.

Semenya doesn’t have a “natural” advantage over her competitors in the same way that taller basketball players can score more easily because they’re closer to the rim than shorter opponents. The reason is that all the players on the court are the same gender. That’s a crucial distinction that the IAAF is making, and if one’s anatomy – i.e., testes – is different, then you’re no longer competing against those of the same gender.

The IAAF could have made its gender decision on the differences and existence/non-existence of external genitalia. Or how a competitor was raised as a child, or a range of other criteria. But in choosing to focus on testosterone – and specifically, any presence of anatomical differences that corrupt a pure XX make-up – it appears perfectly reasonable for the IAAF to draw the gender line where it did.

Erik Lief has produced news and sports programs for CNBC, CBS News, ESPN and the Associated Press.

This article was originally published by the American Council on Science and Health as Deciding Where The ‘Gender Line’ Is In Track & Field, and has been reproduced here with permission.

Outbreak
Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped
Video: Test everyone – Slovakia goes its own way to control COVID

Video: Test everyone – Slovakia goes its own way to control COVID

As Europe sees record coronavirus cases and deaths, Slovakia is testing its entire adult population. WSJ's Drew Hinshaw explains how ...
mag insects image superjumbo v

Disaster interrupted: Which farming system better preserves insect populations: Organic or conventional?

A three-year run of fragmentary Armageddon-like studies had primed the journalism pumps and settled the media framing about the future ...
dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

The media call it the “Insect Apocalypse”. In the past three years, the phrase has become an accepted truth of ...
globalmethanebudget globalcarbonproject cropped x

Infographic: Cows cause climate change? Agriculture scientist says ‘belching bovines’ get too much blame

A recent interview by Caroline Stocks, a UK journalist who writes about food, agriculture and the environment, of air quality ...
organic hillside sweet corn x

Organic v conventional using GMOs: Which is the more sustainable farming?

Many consumers spend more for organic food to avoid genetically modified products in part because they believe that “industrial agriculture” ...
benjamin franklin x

Are most GMO safety studies funded by industry?

The assertion that biotech companies do the research and the government just signs off on it is false ...
favicon

Environmental Working Group: EWG challenges safety of GMOs, food pesticide residues

Known by some as the "Environmental Worrying Group," EWG lobbies for tighter GMO legislation and famously puts out annual "dirty dozen" list of fruits and ...
m hansen

Michael Hansen: Architect of Consumers Union ongoing anti-GMO campaign

Michael K. Hansen (born 1956) is thought by critics to be the prime mover behind the ongoing campaign against agricultural biotechnology at Consumer Reports. He is an ...
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend