Animal biotechnologist Alison Van Eenennaam questions FDA plan to classify CRISPR gene-edited animals as drugs

cow and professor

The [FDA in 2019]  will roll out several guidance documents meant to provide “intensive assistance” for navigating its guidelines for biotech, including gene-editing in animals…. The plan is to create “an efficient, science-based pathway to market for safe animal biotechnology-derived products.”

Industry insiders on both sides of the issue question whether FDA has the authority to regulate gene-edited animals. Jaydee Hanson, senior policy analyst for the Center for Food Safety, has been pushing FDA to develop regulations for decades. He said the agency is in a unique position to institute these regulations, given its previous experience overseeing genetically modified animals used in drug testing.

Alison Van Eenennaam, an animal biotechnology expert at the University of California, Davis, has been working to remove the part of DNA responsible for giving cows horns. Dairy producers typically prefer hornless animals as a matter of animal safety.

Related article:  5 things to know about genetically engineered AquAdvantage salmon coming soon to US grocery stores

Under FDA’s approach, Eenennaam said, her hornless cows are considered “drugs” that need to undergo regulatory review. While she agrees that some genetically modified animals should be regulated, she argues the agency shouldn’t regulate changes to an animal’s DNA that already occur in nature ….

The agency “makes an arbitrary distinction between an intentional edit [by humans] and an unintentional edit by nature …. My cows are not drugs,” she added. “They’re cows.”

Read full, original article: FDA FORGING AHEAD ON ANIMAL BIOTECH

Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped
Video: Test everyone – Slovakia goes its own way to control COVID

Video: Test everyone – Slovakia goes its own way to control COVID

As Europe sees record coronavirus cases and deaths, Slovakia is testing its entire adult population. WSJ's Drew Hinshaw explains how ...
mag insects image superjumbo v

Disaster interrupted: Which farming system better preserves insect populations: Organic or conventional?

A three-year run of fragmentary Armageddon-like studies had primed the journalism pumps and settled the media framing about the future ...
dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

The media call it the “Insect Apocalypse”. In the past three years, the phrase has become an accepted truth of ...
globalmethanebudget globalcarbonproject cropped x

Infographic: Cows cause climate change? Agriculture scientist says ‘belching bovines’ get too much blame

A recent interview by Caroline Stocks, a UK journalist who writes about food, agriculture and the environment, of air quality ...
organic hillside sweet corn x

Organic v conventional using GMOs: Which is the more sustainable farming?

Many consumers spend more for organic food to avoid genetically modified products in part because they believe that “industrial agriculture” ...
benjamin franklin x

Are most GMO safety studies funded by industry?

The assertion that biotech companies do the research and the government just signs off on it is false ...

Environmental Working Group: EWG challenges safety of GMOs, food pesticide residues

Known by some as the "Environmental Worrying Group," EWG lobbies for tighter GMO legislation and famously puts out annual "dirty dozen" list of fruits and ...
m hansen

Michael Hansen: Architect of Consumers Union ongoing anti-GMO campaign

Michael K. Hansen (born 1956) is thought by critics to be the prime mover behind the ongoing campaign against agricultural biotechnology at Consumer Reports. He is an ...
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend