Absolut failure: Kansas farm family takes stand against fear-based non-GMO vodka marketing

| November 6, 2018
Jonathan Van Ness, LGBTQ television personality and Smirnoff brand partner.
This article or excerpt is included in the GLP’s daily curated selection of ideologically diverse news, opinion and analysis of biotechnology innovation.

I don’t throw the word hero around very often, but in this case the cape fits. Out on the vast plains of western Kansas in the tiny agricultural berg of Hoxie, there is a couple that is taking a great risk to stand up for science, stand up for agriculture and stand up for their fellow farmers.

Allison and Cole Nondorf grow corn, milo, soybeans and wheat on thousands of acres near Hoxie. They also operate a wine, beer and liquor retail store in town—A&C Liquid Assets. They carry a cross-section of national brands and local labels, and take great pride in being responsive to customers.

“We only sell what the customer wants,” said Allison Nondorf in a recent interview, “And we’re sensitive to which product lines support agriculture, particularly Midwestern farmers.”

Their extended family supplies seeds to the community, so they are well known in this dense agricultural area of Western Kansas, where farmer helps farmer, neighbor helps neighbor.

Which is precisely why you won’t find Smirnoff products at A&C Liquid Assets.

Smirnoff embarked on an advertising campaign last month for its No. 21 Vodka brand in which Hollywood science and agricultural “experts”—actors Jenna Fischer and Ted Danson—proudly proclaim that it is now “Non-GMO”.

“By using non-GMO corn for Smirnoff No. 21 Vodka, we’re ensuring that anyone who avoids gluten and GMO ingredients in their everyday life still has the option to enjoy a delicious Smirnoff cocktail,” said Jay Sethi, Vice President, Smirnoff, Diageo North America.

The promotion is deceptive, and it is infuriating scientists and farmers.  Alcohol is classified as a Class 1 carcinogen. Apparently, Smirnoff sees value in promoting that an alcoholic drink known to cause cancer in humans is now not made from absolutely harmless ingredients—corn genetically engineered to be herbicide resistant or insect resistant, which substantially curtails the use of insecticides.

After 23 years since the introduction of genetically engineered (or “GMO”) crops to the U.S., there has not been a single case of human or animal illness attributed to their consumption.  On the other hand, it is estimated that alcohol causes more than 21,000 cancer deaths a year, almost four percent of all U.S. cancer deaths. Such deceptive  marketing  follow in the footsteps of Ketle One vodka and Wild Turkey whiskey, which embarked down a similar science-free path a few years ago.vodka 11 5 18 2

Vodka is distilled from fermenting cereal grains or potatoes. It is essentially ethyl alcohol and water, with a dissolved speck of character imparted by volatiles that hitch a ride through the distillation process. Most vodka is does not contain ingredients from genetically engineered crops, as it is made from wheat, rye or potatoes—all non-GE crops. However, some brands, like most of Smirnoff’s other labels, do include corn in the mix, and that likely originates from a plant equipped with biotech traits.

(Note that the non-GMO label is not Smirnoff’s only anti-science marketing scam. It brags that it’s No. 21 Vodka “has always been gluten-free.” That’s true but disingenuous. Smirnoff makes its vodka from corn, while gluten is only linked to wheat-based products, and there is no commercially-produced GMO wheat).

Related article:  Video: Scientists take on Uganda's tough questions about GMO crops

Smirnoff proudly proclaims that it refuses to use ingredients from GE crops. But why and at what consequence to American farmers?

The Nondorfs and the farmers in their community choose to grow GE crops because they are more sustainable. Smirnoff, they said, does not support the farmers that provide the grains that go into their vodka. Their store, A&C Liquid Assets, has decided it will not sell Smirnoff products. Instead, A&C Liquid Assets will offer samples of spirits produced from Kansas-grown grains. Brands like Most Wanted, and Behind Bars are made with local grains.  Milo is a popular local liquor made from locally-grown milo.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on agricultural biotech and biomedicine? Subscribe to our newsletter.

“The locally sourced brands are the same price or less, and you get the pleasure of knowing that it could be your grain and your work inside that bottle,“ Allison Nondorf explained.

It only makes sense.  Why would anyone in agriculture purchase vodka from a company that denigrates the choices that help farmers remain competitive and sustainable?

And in that spirit of support for agriculture, Allison removed the Smirnoff products from the shelves and returned them to the distributor. It is a risky move, as Smirnoff advertises heavily and is a widely-recognized name brand.

Despite a potential loss of sales and removing a brand with name recognition from the shelf, Allison feels that standing up for the science and standing up for farming is much more important.

Allison and Cole are taking a bold step that everyone in agriculture or science should follow—stop supporting companies that capitulate to fear-based marketing to sell a product.

“This community amazes me. We believe our Ag community will support our decision and stand by us in saying no to Smirnoff.  I’m excited to offer the customer a better product that may source from a farm down the street and often at a lower price.”

vodka 11 5 18 3
The Smirnoff brand has been removed from the shelves, as Kansas liquor store owners refuse to sell a product that does not support ingredients grown by local farmers.


Agricultural biotechnology has been a benefit to the farmer, the environment, the consumer, and could go a long way to helping those suffering from food insecurity. The Non-GMO Project and the non-GMO movement have concocted a brand based on fear, creating uncertainty around farmers’ safe products, and going against the grain of science.

Like A&C Liquid Assets on Facebook and share their story widely.

Dr. Kevin Folta is a Professor at the University of Florida actively involved in public education about genetics and agricultural technology.  He hosts the weekly Talking Biotech Podcast featured on the GLP. Follow him on Twitter @kevinfolta

The GLP featured this article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis. The viewpoint is the author’s own. The GLP’s goal is to stimulate constructive discourse on challenging science issues.

Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped
a a b b a f ac a

Video: Death by COVID: The projected grim toll in historical context

The latest statistics, as of July 10, show COVID-19-related deaths in U.S. are just under 1,000 per day nationally, which is ...
mag insects image superjumbo v

Disaster interrupted: Which farming system better preserves insect populations: Organic or conventional?

A three-year run of fragmentary Armageddon-like studies had primed the journalism pumps and settled the media framing about the future ...
dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

The media call it the “Insect Apocalypse”. In the past three years, the phrase has become an accepted truth of ...
types of oak trees

Infographic: Power of evolution? How oak trees came to dominate North American forests

Over the course of some 56 million years, oaks, which all belong to the genus Quercus, evolved from a single undifferentiated ...
biotechnology worker x

Can GMOs rescue threatened plants and crops?

Some scientists and ecologists argue that humans are in the midst of an "extinction crisis" — the sixth wave of ...
food globe x

Are GMOs necessary to feed the world?

Experts estimate that agricultural production needs to roughly double in the coming decades. How can that be achieved? ...
eating gmo corn on the cob x

Are GMOs safe?

In 2015, 15 scientists and activists issued a statement, "No Scientific consensus on GMO safety," in the journal Environmental Sciences ...
Screen Shot at PM

Charles Benbrook: Agricultural economist and consultant for the organic industry and anti-biotechnology advocacy groups

Independent scientists rip Benbrook's co-authored commentary in New England Journal calling for reassessment of dangers of all GMO crops and herbicides ...
Screen Shot at PM

ETC Group: ‘Extreme’ biotechnology critic campaigns against synthetic biology and other forms of ‘extreme genetic engineering’

The ETC Group is an international environmental non-governmental organization (NGO) based in Canada whose stated purpose is to monitor "the impact of emerging technologies and ...
Share via
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend