European Commission science advisers say political decision limiting crop gene editing will leave Europe a technological straggler

alleles

Laws in the EU should be changed to allow plants developed through controversial gene-editing techniques to be more easily put on the market, the European Commission’s scientific advisers said [November 13].

In July, the European Court of Justice ruled that such techniques, whereby organisms are obtained by mutagenesis — a breeding technique that edits the plant’s genes — should be subject to the same strict EU laws that apply to genetically modified organisms (GMOs).

That interpretation of the law was a major setback for …. scientists working to develop high-tech crops in the EU. It also raised questions over whether CRISPR/Cas9, one of the newest genome-editing tools it is hoped could treat disease in humans, would be caught up in the EU’s GMO laws.

Related article:  Monsanto PR firm FleishmanHillard defends effort to gather data on EU pesticide regulators, journalists

But a group of senior scientists appointed to advise the Commission said …. that the interpretation of the law could leave Europe straggling behind other regions in the area of developing plant technologies, which many argue are necessary to make plants more resilient to climate change and to feed a growing world population.

“There is danger that unless the EU improves the regulatory environment for products of gene-editing, it will be left behind in this field, which could also diminish EU influence on ongoing debates at the international level,” the report added.

Read full, original article: Commission scientists back reforms to benefit new GMO techniques

Outbreak
Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped
Video: Test everyone – Slovakia goes its own way to control COVID

Video: Test everyone – Slovakia goes its own way to control COVID

As Europe sees record coronavirus cases and deaths, Slovakia is testing its entire adult population. WSJ's Drew Hinshaw explains how ...
mag insects image superjumbo v

Disaster interrupted: Which farming system better preserves insect populations: Organic or conventional?

A three-year run of fragmentary Armageddon-like studies had primed the journalism pumps and settled the media framing about the future ...
dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

The media call it the “Insect Apocalypse”. In the past three years, the phrase has become an accepted truth of ...
globalmethanebudget globalcarbonproject cropped x

Infographic: Cows cause climate change? Agriculture scientist says ‘belching bovines’ get too much blame

A recent interview by Caroline Stocks, a UK journalist who writes about food, agriculture and the environment, of air quality ...
organic hillside sweet corn x

Organic v conventional using GMOs: Which is the more sustainable farming?

Many consumers spend more for organic food to avoid genetically modified products in part because they believe that “industrial agriculture” ...
benjamin franklin x

Are most GMO safety studies funded by industry?

The assertion that biotech companies do the research and the government just signs off on it is false ...
favicon

Environmental Working Group: EWG challenges safety of GMOs, food pesticide residues

Known by some as the "Environmental Worrying Group," EWG lobbies for tighter GMO legislation and famously puts out annual "dirty dozen" list of fruits and ...
m hansen

Michael Hansen: Architect of Consumers Union ongoing anti-GMO campaign

Michael K. Hansen (born 1956) is thought by critics to be the prime mover behind the ongoing campaign against agricultural biotechnology at Consumer Reports. He is an ...
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend