Agriculture commissioner says EU must decide if ‘science or politics’ will drive gene-edited crop regulations

| | January 29, 2019
Image: iStock/Zerbor
This article or excerpt is included in the GLP’s daily curated selection of ideologically diverse news, opinion and analysis of biotechnology innovation.

The European governments have to decide whether science or politics are applied when it comes to issues such as new plant breeding techniques (NPBTs), EU’s Commissioner for Agriculture and Rural Development Phil Hogan said.

Speaking to a group of journalists on 24 January, Hogan said, “I think 2019 will be an opportunity for overall reflection and see what the legal options are at the highest level of governments about whether we accept science or not as the basis of making decisions on these issues.”

In July 2018, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled that organisms obtained by mutagenesis plant breeding technique are genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and should, in principle, fall under the GMO Directive.

Related article:  As rising oceans encroach on arable land, gene editing, floating farms may help feed the world

Asked by about his view on the ECJ decision, Hogan said he was “surprised” by the ruling.

“Health Commissioner Vytenis Andriukaitis is looking at this intensively to see what the legal options available are….It’s going to be a big issue: is it going to be the application of science or the application of political opinions? What are the criteria? This political debate is on its way….” he added.

Read full, original article: EU agriculture Commissioner ‘surprised’ by gene editing court ruling

Share via
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend