Could this synthetic enzyme lead to a treatment for celiac disease?

b f d e
Image credit: Stefka Pavlova

Synthetic biology is like genetic engineering on steroids. Using cutting edge computational design, synthetic biology aims to design novel biological molecules or even entire metabolic systems. However, because synthetic biology is a relatively new field, there are few real-world applications as of yet. Our plan is to change that.

Our story begins with undergraduate students at the University of Washington. In 2011, I led a team of students who entered the International Genetically Engineered Machine (iGEM) competition. During the course of a summer, the contest asks students to design, build, and test a new biological molecule or system – using the tools of synthetic biology and their imagination. In 2011, our team decided to develop a therapeutic for celiac disease.

Celiac disease is characterized by an inappropriate immune response to gluten, a protein found in any food containing wheat, rye, or barley. Individuals with this genetic condition suffer from gastrointestinal (GI) or systemic issues that can range from mild to quite serious. In celiac patients, gluten enters the intestines only partially digested. Immediately, these gluten fragments trigger inflammation, causing diarrhea and other symptoms associated with the condition. It is estimated that approximately 1% of Americans have celiac disease, though many remain undiagnosed.

An oral enzyme is the ideal therapy for celiac disease. The idea is that a celiac patient would take an enzyme, similar to the digestive enzymes already present in our GI tract, but capable of breaking down the problematic regions of gluten. If the enzyme is taken before a meal, hopefully any trace levels of gluten could be digested before they can trigger an immune response. Though simple in theory, developing such a therapy is difficult in practice.

The reason is because it is difficult for most enzymes to function in the human stomach. Anything that you swallow is subjected to the harsh reality of stomach acid. Enzymes are proteins, and most proteins meet their demise in the stomach. Thus, not only would the enzyme need to specifically digest gluten (we wouldn’t want the enzyme to be distracted by other proteins), it would need to survive long enough in the stomach to accomplish its mission, which is to digest gluten to below the threshold that can trigger an immune response in people with celiac disease. Finding a naturally occurring enzyme that could do all this would be nearly impossible, which is why this puzzle presented a great opportunity for synthetic biology.

Related article:  ‘Cutting-edge’ artificial cells could boost precision medicine efforts

We began by making use of the pioneering computer software, the Rosetta Molecular Modeling Suite, that helps design novel proteins (such as enzymes). As a starting template, we chose a protein-digesting enzyme that was already known to have high activity in acidic conditions. But, it did not have the gluten-killing activity that we desired.

So using a video game-like interface to Rosetta called Fold-it, our iGEM team redesigned the enzyme on the computer in order to change its specificity from its original target to gluten. We then selected roughly 100 candidate theoretical enzyme designs. Next, we produced these engineered enzymes in the lab and tested them for their ability to break down gluten.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on agricultural biotech and biomedicine? Subscribe to our newsletter.

Lo and behold, some of the enzymes the students designed actually worked. By combining pieces from the best performing enzymes, we developed a prototype gluten-degrading enzyme. We named it KumaMax, which derives from the name of the starting template enzyme (kumamolisin).

As it so happens, not only did our iGEM team win the competition – defeating over 150 other teams – this work provided the foundation for a body of work that turned into a startup company.

After about five years of additional tweaking of the prototype enzyme at the University of Washington’s Institute for Protein Design, the next step was to move towards commercialization, and we secured funding for Phase I clinical trials.  We spun out a company from the University of Washington, officially launching on January 1, 2017, to bring this enzyme from the bench into humans.

Now the real experiment begins: Soon, we will be testing our product in actual celiac patients, hoping to forever change their lives using the power of synthetic biology.

Dr. Ingrid Pultz is Chief Scientific Officer at PvP Biologics

A version of this article was originally published on American Council on Science and Health’s website asHow Synthetic Biology Could Treat Celiac Diseaseand has been republished here with permission.

Outbreak
Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped
can you boost your immune system to prevent coronavirus spread x

Video: How to boost your immune system to guard against COVID and other illnesses

Scientists have recently developed ways to measure your immune age. Fortunately, it turns out your immune age can go down ...
mag insects image superjumbo v

Disaster interrupted: Which farming system better preserves insect populations: Organic or conventional?

A three-year run of fragmentary Armageddon-like studies had primed the journalism pumps and settled the media framing about the future ...
dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

The media call it the “Insect Apocalypse”. In the past three years, the phrase has become an accepted truth of ...
globalmethanebudget globalcarbonproject cropped x

Infographic: Cows cause climate change? Agriculture scientist says ‘belching bovines’ get too much blame

A recent interview by Caroline Stocks, a UK journalist who writes about food, agriculture and the environment, of air quality ...
organic hillside sweet corn x

Organic v conventional using GMOs: Which is the more sustainable farming?

Many consumers spend more for organic food to avoid genetically modified products in part because they believe that “industrial agriculture” ...
benjamin franklin x

Are most GMO safety studies funded by industry?

The assertion that biotech companies do the research and the government just signs off on it is false ...
gmo corn field x

Do GMO Bt (insect-resistant) crops pose a threat to human health or the environment?

Bt is a bacterium found organically in the soil. It is extremely effective in repelling or killing target insects but ...
favicon

Environmental Working Group: EWG challenges safety of GMOs, food pesticide residues

Known by some as the "Environmental Worrying Group," EWG lobbies for tighter GMO legislation and famously puts out annual "dirty dozen" list of fruits and ...
m hansen

Michael Hansen: Architect of Consumers Union ongoing anti-GMO campaign

Michael K. Hansen (born 1956) is thought by critics to be the prime mover behind the ongoing campaign against agricultural biotechnology at Consumer Reports. He is an ...
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend