Viewpoint: USDA’s bioengineered food rules will confuse consumers and could cost $200 million per year

bioengineered
One of the USDA-approved labels for 'bioengineered' food. Image: USDA
This article or excerpt is included in the GLP’s daily curated selection of ideologically diverse news, opinion and analysis of biotechnology innovation.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture has created what may be the most bewildering, least cost-effective regulation ever.

In July 2016, Congress passed a law mandating that all food containing genetic material that has been modified with recombinant DNA….bear labels clearly identifying it as “bioengineered.” The statute acknowledged that bioengineered food is neither more nor less safe than other food, but the new rule—the National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard, or NBFDS—won’t help consumers understand that. It will only leave them confused.

Under the NBFDS, two identical bottles of corn oil on a supermarket shelf could be labeled differently—one as bioengineered, one not—even though both were derived from the same field and are identical in processing and quality. Both labels would comply with the regulation because the new rule doesn’t require a label “if the food does not contain detectable genetically modified material”….

Related article:  Could gene editing overcome 'squeamishness' about GMOs and crop biotechnology?

What elevates the rule from an irritant to an outrage is the USDA’s own admissions about its costs, which will “range from $569 million to $3.9 billion for the first year.” Thereafter, there will be additional costs annually….of “$68 million to $234 million at a three percent discount rate and $91 million to $391 million at a seven percent discount rate”….

Read full, original article: This May Be the Worst Regulation Ever

Share via
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend