The GLP is committed to full transparency. Download and review our 2019 Annual Report

Controversial weed killer dicamba could have outsized negative impact on consumer perceptions of pesticide safety

Soybean leaf damaged by dicamba drift. Image: DTN/Emily Unglesbee)
This article or excerpt is included in the GLP’s daily curated selection of ideologically diverse news, opinion and analysis of biotechnology innovation.

For better or worse, the widespread use of dicamba is pushing an entire industry to scrutinize how herbicides behave, how they’re regulated, who suffers when they don’t stay put and how they affect trees, plants and even people.

For now, scientists are behind a lot of this scrutiny. The conclusions that are emerging on off-target dicamba movement are generally data-based and sound. But soon — perhaps this year, perhaps the next — the American public may take the wheel. Production agriculture’s chemical use could never be the same again.

Chemical drift is not a new problem in agriculture, but dicamba is especially visible. Minute amounts of dicamba can cause distinctive cupping, strapping and crinkling on a wide range of vegetation, from soybeans to tomatoes and oak trees….Ultimately, dicamba’s visibility may soon move this issue out of agriculture and regulators’ domain, and into the public’s.

Related article:  Viewpoint: How the Organic Trade Association flunked Science 101—No, organics are not 'chemical free'

Agrichemical companies, regulators and farmers have perhaps one more year, maybe two, to take ownership and responsibility for off-target dicamba movement. After that, they may have to accept the consequences of an unsympathetic public calling the shots on this chemical’s use.

Read full, original article: How Dicamba’s Visibility Could Change Ag Pesticide Use Forever

News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.

Send this to a friend