FDA-approved edible cotton seeds show how GMO, CRISPR-edited crops can battle global hunger

cotton seeds
Edible cotton

Malnutrition is nothing short of a global health crisis. According to the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), roughly 815 million of the 7.6 billion people in the world are classified as chronically undernourished, and 9 million of them die each year due to hunger-related illness.

The situation is truly tragic, but it’s also solvable. A wide variety of solutions have been devised to tackle the malnutrition epidemic, and you may find the newest one quite surprising: edible cotton. By genetically engineering cotton to remove a toxin called gossypol, scientists have potentially turned the 40 million tons of cotton seed produced each year into a sustainable source of protein, one of the most important nutrients insufficiently available to poor people around the world.

Let them eat cotton

This photo shows the massive amounts of seed resulting from cotton production.

Cotton is grown by over 20 million farmers in 80 countries and represents a substantial cash crop in the developing world. Unlike most commodity crops, which are grown for their seed, cotton is generally grown for fiber production, the long whispy filaments that suspend the cotton seed. However, the seed contains a concentration of high-quality calories that have only remained inaccessible because the seed also contains a harmful toxin.

Cotton produces gossypol, a terpenoid and natural pesticide that protects the plant from hungry insects. In mammals it is readily absorbed in the intestine and accumulates in the body. Consumption of raw cottonseed oil in a cotton-producing region of China in the 1930s and 1940s led to widespread male and female sterility, with no children being born during that time. The toxin progressively affects the heart and secondarily the liver. Consumption also leads to protein malnutrition.

During processing fiber is harvested and the abundant seeds may be separated into cottonseed oil (which is processed to remove any gossypol) and a by-product called cottonseed meal. At 22% protein, world production of cottonseed meal contains the protein equivalent (by weight) of all of the eggs in the world, enough to feed 500 million people high-quality protein for a year. Yet because of the high gossypol levels, cottonseed meal can at best be used as a protein supplement to feed beef cattle and other ruminants, as their unique digestive systems can tolerate supplemental amounts of this toxic compound.

Genetic engineering changes the game

With the help of genetic engineering, researchers have developed a new type of cotton that virtually eliminates gossypol, meaning the seed and its plethora of nutrients may be safely consumed by humans and other non-ruminants. This innovation could allow growers in major cotton-producing countries like China, India, and nations throughout Africa to sell their crops as food.

Related article:  Viewpoint: Demand for non-GMO food suggests consumers want 'easy' answers to nutrition and health

The idea is not a new one. For decades, researchers tried to breed low-gossypol cotton, but a reduction of this compound left the plants vulnerable to insect attack. A research team led by Dr. Keerti Rathore at Texas A&M University finally solved this problem by eliminating gossypol only from the seed. This two-decade-long effort yielded a plant that can still defend itself against insect invasion, but produces a non-toxic seed. The innovation was deregulated by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) in October 2018 and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) this month.

To accomplish this feat, the team targeted an enzyme required for gossypol production using a gene-silencing technique called RNA interference (RNAi). To decrease the level of the enzyme, they created genetically engineered plants that suppress the delta-Cadinene Synthase (dCS) gene. This gene encodes the instructions for an early step in gossypol synthesis, so shutting it down limits the amount of gossypol produced.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on agricultural biotech and biomedicine? Subscribe to our newsletter.

Because gossypol is important for insect protection, interrupting synthesis of this compound would possibly require more insecticide to protect the plants, leading to higher costs for farmers and possible effects on non-target insect populations. As a result, the RNAi mechanism was turned on using a promoter (a genetic on/off switch) from the alpha-globulin gene, a gene producing a seed-specific protein. This promoter allowed seed-specific suppression of the dCS gene and no gossypol production in seeds—while the rest of the plant produced the natural insecticide. Cotton lines bred against this genetic background should suppress gossypol production.

The resulting seeds will be used to create ultra-low gossypol, high-protein flours that can be manufactured into animal feed and even food for human consumption. Such products will be welcome in the developing world, where diets based on grains and tubers often contain insufficient protein.

This innovation once again underscores the importance of leveraging genetic engineering to increase sustainable food production. Although we can’t eliminate hunger overnight, the development and release of this breakthrough cotton variety will help combat a lot of needless suffering around the world.

Kevin M. Folta is a professor in the Horticultural Sciences Department at the University of Florida. Follow professor Folta on Twitter @kevinfolta and email your questions to [email protected]

Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped

Video: We can ‘finally’ grow GMOs—Nigerian farmer explains why developing countries need biotech crops

Nigerian farmer Patience Koku discusses the GMO crop trials she is conducting on her farm, and why growers can "rise ...
mag insects image superjumbo v

Disaster interrupted: Which farming system better preserves insect populations: Organic or conventional?

A three-year run of fragmentary Armageddon-like studies had primed the journalism pumps and settled the media framing about the future ...
dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

The media call it the “Insect Apocalypse”. In the past three years, the phrase has become an accepted truth of ...
breastfeeding bed x facebook x

Infographic: We know breastfeeding helps children. Now we know it helps mothers too

When a woman becomes pregnant, her risk of type 2 diabetes increases for the rest of her life, perhaps because ...
organic hillside sweet corn x

Organic v conventional using GMOs: Which is the more sustainable farming?

Many consumers spend more for organic food to avoid genetically modified products in part because they believe that “industrial agriculture” ...
benjamin franklin x

Are most GMO safety studies funded by industry?

The assertion that biotech companies do the research and the government just signs off on it is false ...
gmo corn field x

Do GMO Bt (insect-resistant) crops pose a threat to human health or the environment?

Bt is a bacterium found organically in the soil. It is extremely effective in repelling or killing target insects but ...

Environmental Working Group: EWG challenges safety of GMOs, food pesticide residues

Known by some as the "Environmental Worrying Group," EWG lobbies for tighter GMO legislation and famously puts out annual "dirty dozen" list of fruits and ...
m hansen

Michael Hansen: Architect of Consumers Union ongoing anti-GMO campaign

Michael K. Hansen (born 1956) is thought by critics to be the prime mover behind the ongoing campaign against agricultural biotechnology at Consumer Reports. He is an ...
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend