Podcast: How activists and politicians derailed South Australia’s attempt to embrace GMO crops

gmo x resized

Australia has grown GMO crops for well over 15 years and reaped the predictable benefits—most notably an 80 percent drop in pesticide use. But the controversy didn’t end after the federal government enacted regulations in 2000 to ensure the safe use of crop biotechnology. Following intense lobbying from environmental activist groups, the state of South Australia implemented a temporary moratorium on GMO crop cultivation in 2004, ostensibly to evaluate concerns that GMO canola could pose a threat to human health.

The ban was supposed to be a temporary measure. However, continued pressure from the organic food industry prompted the state government to enact a series of extensions that kept the moratorium in place well past its scheduled end date. In 2017, the political landscape shifted when a new administration took control of South Australia’s government. Officials examined whether or not the moratorium had served its purpose and ultimately decided to rescind the ban, a move enthusiastically endorsed by many of the state’s farmers.

But local activists connected to Green Party and Labor Party representatives in Parliament derailed the government’s plan and kept the moratorium in place. Minister of Primary Industries and Regional Development Tim Whetstone said on Dec. 3 the last-minute reversal came down to “petty politics” and vowed to introduce legislation to finally rescind the moratorium, which he said harms the state’s economy:

By continuing to leave a moratorium in place the Labor Party are costing farmers in South Australia real money and denying them a basic right – choice. New and improved crop varieties will also help farmers tackle drought and climate change as we look to provide our grain growers with as many tools as possible.

[Editor’s note: The debate over South Australia’s GMO moratorium is ongoing. GLP is monitoring the situation and will post updates as they become available.]

On this episode of Talking Biotech, plant geneticist and host Kevin Folta sits down with Caroline Rhodes, CEO of Grain Producers South Australia. Rhodes breaks down Australia’s complex history with crop biotechnology and explains the playbook local activists use to manipulate politicians with fear, uncertainty and doubt. Ultimately, she says, this is a case of restricting farmer choice for political reasons.

Caroline Rhodes is the CEO of Grain Producers South Australia. Follow her on Twitter @bespoke_rural

Kevin M. Folta is a professor in the Horticultural Sciences Department at the University of Florida. Follow professor Folta on Twitter @kevinfolta and email your questions to [email protected]

Related article:  Cattle industry fights to preserve 'meat' label as plant-based meat-like products proliferate

The Talking Biotech podcast, produced by Kevin Folta, is available for listening or subscription:

Apple Podcasts | Android | Email | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | RSS | Player FM | Pod Directory | TuneIn

Outbreak
Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped
can you boost your immune system to prevent coronavirus spread x

Video: How to boost your immune system to guard against COVID and other illnesses

Scientists have recently developed ways to measure your immune age. Fortunately, it turns out your immune age can go down ...
mag insects image superjumbo v

Disaster interrupted: Which farming system better preserves insect populations: Organic or conventional?

A three-year run of fragmentary Armageddon-like studies had primed the journalism pumps and settled the media framing about the future ...
dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

The media call it the “Insect Apocalypse”. In the past three years, the phrase has become an accepted truth of ...
globalmethanebudget globalcarbonproject cropped x

Infographic: Cows cause climate change? Agriculture scientist says ‘belching bovines’ get too much blame

A recent interview by Caroline Stocks, a UK journalist who writes about food, agriculture and the environment, of air quality ...
organic hillside sweet corn x

Organic v conventional using GMOs: Which is the more sustainable farming?

Many consumers spend more for organic food to avoid genetically modified products in part because they believe that “industrial agriculture” ...
benjamin franklin x

Are most GMO safety studies funded by industry?

The assertion that biotech companies do the research and the government just signs off on it is false ...
gmo corn field x

Do GMO Bt (insect-resistant) crops pose a threat to human health or the environment?

Bt is a bacterium found organically in the soil. It is extremely effective in repelling or killing target insects but ...
favicon

Environmental Working Group: EWG challenges safety of GMOs, food pesticide residues

Known by some as the "Environmental Worrying Group," EWG lobbies for tighter GMO legislation and famously puts out annual "dirty dozen" list of fruits and ...
m hansen

Michael Hansen: Architect of Consumers Union ongoing anti-GMO campaign

Michael K. Hansen (born 1956) is thought by critics to be the prime mover behind the ongoing campaign against agricultural biotechnology at Consumer Reports. He is an ...
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend