Worst-case scenario for coronavirus deaths ‘imperfect and has to rely on a number of assumptions’

| | March 19, 2020
screenshot did the coronavirus get more deadly the death rate explained
Credit: Fatemeh Bahrami/Anadolu Agency
This article or excerpt is included in the GLP’s daily curated selection of ideologically diverse news, opinion and analysis of biotechnology innovation.

On Monday [March 16], the COVID-19 Response Team at Imperial College London released a report that describes its efforts to create a model of how various control efforts could alter the trajectory of the coronavirus pandemic in the US and UK. …

The report paints a grim picture of millions of deaths in the two countries if nothing is done… .

Before this induces panic, however, it’s important to emphasize that these outcomes are based on a model that, because of the incomplete information we currently possess, is imperfect and has to rely on a number of assumptions. We’ll go over all of these limitations before going into detail on the conclusions the Imperial College team derived from the model.

Related article:  The problem with winter: Indoor heating creates an easy pathway for coronavirus to spread
screen shot at pm x
While the critical care capacity remains fixed, most mediation methods allow enough cases to vastly exceed it.

While the authors do their best to base their assumptions on real-world data here, all of the values that describe the coronavirus’ behavior are uncertain.

The biggest test of this model is that some countries that were aggressive about testing and suppression efforts have successfully limited the spread of the coronavirus and are beginning to lift their restrictions. If the authors’ model is accurate, then countries like China and South Korea are at risk of seeing a resurgence of cases.

Read the original article

Share via
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend