Viewpoint: Plant biodiversity cuts pesticide use, but may slash crop yields needed to feed more people

Spare Share e

Everyone recognizes that less less food means fewer pests but when you have to grow food to keep billions from starving, yields matter. Farming has gotten more efficient, thanks to big data tools leading to targeted pesticide use and modern pesticides that are less toxic to the environment while still getting rid of pests, such as neonicotinoids.

That’s important. Even with modern science, insects cause losses of up to 18 percent and in older practices that use less-effective pesticides like the organic manufacturing process, those yield losses are even higher – along with food costs.

Results from two ongoing experiments show that species-rich plant communities are less attractive to herbivores. The downside means less food.

jena experiment germany
The Jena Experiment in Germany. Credit: Matthias Ditscherlein

In Germany and the United States, the plots revealed that in high-diversity mixtures, food and other plants, the feeding rate of herbivores per gram of plant biomass was 44 percent lower than in monocultures. For every gram of plant biomass produced, plants lose just under half as much energy to arthropod herbivores when planted in species-rich communities.

The reason, the authors propose, is that in patches with higher plant diversity, arthropod herbivores have lower chances of encountering their preferred plant species, which makes them less likely that they will remain in high-diversity patches. In addition, previous research had shown lower levels of tissue protein (nitrogen) in plant communities with high species richness, making these plants less nutritious for herbivores.

Yet the total biomass of herbivores and predators both increased in species-rich grasslands.

Related article:  Viewpoint: Here's why we don't have to worry about a world without insects
Follow the latest news and policy debates on agricultural biotech and biomedicine? Subscribe to our newsletter.

Compared to monocultures, both plant pests and their predators increased notably in both their total biomass and feeding rates in species-rich grasslands. A possible explanation could be that arthropod predators such as spiders, some beetles or wasps benefit significantly from the more complex habitat of high-diversity plant communities, which reduces their risk of being detected and eaten by vertebrate predators such as birds and mammals.

So increasing plant diversity has several positive side effects: Compared to monocultures, high-diversity plant communities produce more total biomass. In addition, both natural enemies and resource concentration act in concert to constrain the negative effects of herbivores on plant performance; more predators and less preferred food.

By contrast, pest control that relies heavily on insecticides can lead to detrimental rebounds of herbivore pests as pesticide application may also destabilize the communities of natural enemies.

Yet the big worry will be the impact of higher cost food on the poor. During the COVID-19 pandemic a billion people will already face greater insecurity, so they will need more science and less ‘naturalistic’ fads until the crisis is over. Alternatives to agriculture remain a luxury.

A version of this article was originally posted at Science 2.0 and has been reposted here with permission. Science 2.0 can be found on Twitter @science2_0

Outbreak
Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped
Video: Test everyone – Slovakia goes its own way to control COVID

Video: Test everyone – Slovakia goes its own way to control COVID

As Europe sees record coronavirus cases and deaths, Slovakia is testing its entire adult population. WSJ's Drew Hinshaw explains how ...
mag insects image superjumbo v

Disaster interrupted: Which farming system better preserves insect populations: Organic or conventional?

A three-year run of fragmentary Armageddon-like studies had primed the journalism pumps and settled the media framing about the future ...
dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

The media call it the “Insect Apocalypse”. In the past three years, the phrase has become an accepted truth of ...
globalmethanebudget globalcarbonproject cropped x

Infographic: Cows cause climate change? Agriculture scientist says ‘belching bovines’ get too much blame

A recent interview by Caroline Stocks, a UK journalist who writes about food, agriculture and the environment, of air quality ...
organic hillside sweet corn x

Organic v conventional using GMOs: Which is the more sustainable farming?

Many consumers spend more for organic food to avoid genetically modified products in part because they believe that “industrial agriculture” ...
benjamin franklin x

Are most GMO safety studies funded by industry?

The assertion that biotech companies do the research and the government just signs off on it is false ...
favicon

Environmental Working Group: EWG challenges safety of GMOs, food pesticide residues

Known by some as the "Environmental Worrying Group," EWG lobbies for tighter GMO legislation and famously puts out annual "dirty dozen" list of fruits and ...
m hansen

Michael Hansen: Architect of Consumers Union ongoing anti-GMO campaign

Michael K. Hansen (born 1956) is thought by critics to be the prime mover behind the ongoing campaign against agricultural biotechnology at Consumer Reports. He is an ...
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend