Study: How gene-edited crops are regulated around the world

Credit: Chris George/Alamy/Canva
Credit: Chris George/Alamy/Canva
To date, many countries have made decisions on the regulatory status of products of genome editing, by exempting some kinds of edits from the classical GMO regulation. However, the guidance differs between countries even in the same region. Several countries are still debating the issue or are in the progress of updating guidance and regulatory systems to cover products of genome editing. The current global situation of different regulatory systems is putting a harmonized framework on genome-edited crops in the far future. In this update, we summarize the current developments in the field of regulation concerning edited crops and present a short insight into perception of genome editing in the society.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

In Switzerland, the association “Varieties for Tomorrow” which is composed of various actors from the Swiss agriculture and food industry called for an open and differentiated approach to NGT in plant breeding. Furthermore, the Science Commission of the States voted for the first time in favor of GEd.

In Canada, there is no separate GMO regulation, but there is a regulatory regime dealing with novel foods and with respect to risk assessment obligations with new substances notification.

South Africa which was long time undecided on how to deal with GEd has announced its regulatory approaches for “New breeding technologies” through a public notice after a discussion on the GMO status of “NBT products” on October 27, 2021 (Republic of South Africa, 2021). The executive council of South Africa has concluded that for “NBTs” the same risk assessment framework should apply as for GMOs based on the definition of a GMO in the South African GMO Act. Based on this decision, the application forms were updated and products of “NBTs” are seen as a GMO regardless of the type.

In contrast to this, Kenya has recently released its guidelines as well. The Kenyan guidelines rely on a case-by-case evaluation based on the presence of transgenes and are comparable to the ones which are in place in Nigeria including deregulation of cisgenesis and in cases where foreign DNA is absent (“all deletions/knock outs”).

Dark green: legislation open toward GEd, light green: open legislation or positive statement being prepared, yellow: discussion ongoing Red: strict regulation Credit: Sprink et. al.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}
skin microbiome x final

Infographic: Could gut bacteria help us diagnose and treat diseases? This is on the horizon thanks to CRISPR gene editing

Humans are never alone. Even in a room devoid of other people, they are always in the company of billions ...
glp menu logo outlined

Newsletter Subscription

* indicates required
Email Lists
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.