Want to learn more about how genes have shaped your personality and health — but you’re wary of genetic data leaks? There may be a solution

Credit: National Institute of Standards and Technology
Credit: National Institute of Standards and Technology

Genome-wide prediction and association studies offer a powerful approach to connecting genotype to phenotype at a large scale, but performing genomic analyses in humans invokes genomic privacy concerns that complicate the sharing of data. In a study published in the March issue of GENETICS, [researcher Tianjing] Zhao and colleagues expand an existing encryption approach, offering a secure avenue to perform genomic analysis without compromising confidentiality.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Because of the inherent privacy and intellectual property concerns, direct sharing of raw genotype and phenotype data is often prohibited, for example in human research; researchers first anonymize sensitive information like individual ID numbers, sex, disease status, family relations between individuals, and other covariates before performing any calculations.

So then, in a research landscape that values open-access data principles like FAIR (findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable), how can population geneticists make their data widely available without compromising the privacy of the individuals in question?

Several data encryption approaches that obscure sensitive information have been developed; the homomorphic encryption method for genotype and phenotype (HEGP) methodology encrypts genotype, phenotype, and covariate data in a way that cannot be linked back to original identifiers, thus maintaining data privacy.

In conclusion, geneticists have an encryption method available for genomic analyses that allows them to perform necessary statistical analyses without disclosing sensitive information, thereby avoiding privacy concerns altogether.

This is an excerpt. Read the full article here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-04-22-at-12.21.32-PM
Viewpoint: Why the retracted Monsanto glyphosate study doesn’t change the science—the world’s most popular herbicide is safe 
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-16-2026-02_56_53-PM
Financial incentives, over diagnosis, and weak oversight: Autism claims are driving up Medicare costs
Picture1
The FDA couldn’t find a vaccine safety crisis, so it buried its own research
global warming
‘Implausible’: Top climate scientists reject worst-case scenario—soaring temperatures and fast-rising sea levels
ChatGPT-Image-May-1-2026-11_42_59-AM-2
Viewpoint: NAD is the wellness grifters latest evidence-lite longevity fad. At least the mice are impressed.

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.