Opportunities, challenges and concerns as gene edited pigs may soon be on the regulatory platter in Europe

_20240220_on_crispr_pig

The US Food and Drug Administrationโ€™s (FDAโ€™s) recent decision [approving gene edited pigs] has prompted [quesions about] what this technology might mean for the future of the industry in Europe.

The gene edit approved can now be used by [the Pig Improvement Company] to breed PRRS-resistant pigs. On farms, this means that the negative impacts of PRRS could become a thing of the past, alongside significant benefits in productivity and reductions in antibiotic usage. It is highly likely that this marks only the beginning, with further approvals from PIC and other genetic companies expected to follow, targeting other diseases.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

The real question is: where does this stop? Could gene editing be used to directly improve productivity traits such as average daily gain or litter size? Might it be used to alter the composition of pig meat, such as enhancing the fatty acid profile in fat, to provide health benefits to consumers?

Genetic companies might even use the technology to enable pigs to express enzymes they do not normally produce, such as phytase. This would allow pigs to release phosphorus from plant-bound phytate, or digest feed materials currently unusable to them.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosateโ€”the world's most heavily-used herbicideโ€”pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-04-22-at-12.21.32-PM
Viewpoint: Why the retracted Monsanto glyphosate study doesnโ€™t change the scienceโ€”the worldโ€™s most popular herbicide is safeย 
Picture1
The FDA couldnโ€™t find a vaccine safety crisis, so it buried its own research
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-16-2026-02_56_53-PM
Financial incentives, over diagnosis, and weak oversight: Autism claims are driving up Medicare costs
global warming
โ€˜Implausibleโ€™: Top climate scientists reject worst-case scenarioโ€”soaring temperatures and fast-rising sea levels
ChatGPT-Image-May-1-2026-11_42_59-AM-2
Viewpoint: NAD is the wellness grifters latest evidence-lite longevity fad. At least the mice are impressed.

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.