Here is a primer as the European Union edges closer to loosening regulations on gene editing

Credit: LabioTech
Credit: LabioTech

For more than 20 years, the use of genetic engineering in agriculture has been regulated uniformly across the EU. Current EU law regulates the approval, traceability, and labeling of genetically modified plants and their products. This legal framework is intended in particular to ensure risk assessment in the form of a comprehensive environmental impact assessment and the freedom of choice of consumers for or against GMO-free food.

New genomic techniques such as the CRISPR/Cas gene scissors have led to rapid progress in green genetic engineering, as they open up new possibilities for intervening in the genome of organisms simply, precisely, and quickly.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

The protective mechanisms of current EU law no longer seem to be up to date, and so the EU Commission has initiated a new legislative process in 2023 to promote the establishment of green genetic engineering in the EU.

This means that green genetic engineering is back on the political agenda โ€“ and back in the public debate. Interest groups are arguing about easing restrictions on field trials, patent bans for new genomic processes, maintaining the labeling requirement, or the ban on genetic engineering in organic farming.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosateโ€”the world's most heavily-used herbicideโ€”pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-04-22-at-12.21.32-PM
Viewpoint: Why the retracted Monsanto glyphosate study doesnโ€™t change the scienceโ€”the worldโ€™s most popular herbicide is safeย 
Picture1
The FDA couldnโ€™t find a vaccine safety crisis, so it buried its own research
ChatGPT-Image-May-1-2026-11_42_59-AM-2
Viewpoint: NAD is the wellness grifters latest evidence-lite longevity fad. At least the mice are impressed.
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-16-2026-02_56_53-PM
Financial incentives, over diagnosis, and weak oversight: Autism claims are driving up Medicare costs
global warming
โ€˜Implausibleโ€™: Top climate scientists reject worst-case scenarioโ€”soaring temperatures and fast-rising sea levels
ChatGPT-Image-May-12-2026-11_27_01-AM-2
AI likely to improve health care, research showsโ€”but not for blacks and ethnic minorities
ChatGPT-Image-May-7-2026-01_23_27-PM-2
Viewpoint: Will AI democratize personalized cancer treatment or fuel medical misinformation?

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.