The GLP is committed to full transparency. Download and review our Annual Report.

biotech facts fallacies

Podcast: ‘Artificial womb’ raises awkward ethical questions about abortion, child welfare and health freedom

, | April 2, 2019
CO-HOST OVERVIEW
Cameron English: GLP Senior Agricultural Genetics Editor Cameron English co-hosts the Biotech Facts and Fallacies podcast with Steve Savage.    More details
Steve Savage: Steve Savage, plant pathologist and agriculture industry consultant, co-hosts the Biotech Facts and Fallacies podcast with Cameron English.    More details

Biotechnology is fundamentally changing food and medicine. Thanks to genetic engineering, for example, we have access vitamin-fortified GMO crops, plentiful supplies of insulin and even new vaccines to combat infectious diseases. While these technologies remain controversial among some activist groups and consumers, the tangible health and environmental benefits of genetic engineering have countered most of the ethical concerns raised about manipulating DNA to produce desirable food crops and life-saving drugs.

Related article:  'Most foods are GMOs' and other popular anti-biotech myths debunked
ross studio cutout
Ross Pomeroy

But this doesn’t tell the whole story. In the coming decades, certain developments in biotechnology will almost certainly force us to ask some awkward ethical questions—for which there aren’t yet clear answers. So-called ‘artificial womb’ technology is one such example. Recent research suggests that it may be possible one day to keep a human fetus alive outside its mother’s uterus from fertilization to full-term infancy. This would be great news for the 30,000 babies born prematurely each year. However, if and when that technology leaves the realm of science fiction, the ongoing political debate over abortion, for instance, will never be the same. As RealClearSciece editor Ross Pomeroy recently noted:

As artificial wombs arrive and push the age of fetal viability earlier and earlier, the debate over abortion will transition to one over “extraction.” Imagine a world where the developing embryo is viable immediately at conception. Under current laws, states could potentially prohibit mothers from killing the fetus and require them instead to undergo an extraction procedure to place it in an artificial womb until it is ready to survive outside as a fully-formed baby.

On this episode of Biotech Facts and Fallacies, Pomeroy joins the GLP’s Cameron English to explore how this artificial womb technology could drastically change the discussions we have about abortion, parental rights and even the government’s role in our medical decisions.

Subscribe to the Biotech Facts and Fallacies podcast on iTunes.

Ross Pomeroy is a science writer and the editor at RealClearScience. Follow him on Twitter @SteRoPo and visit his blog.

Cameron J. English is the GLP’s senior agricultural genetics and special projects editor. He is a science writer and podcast host. Follow him on Twitter @camjenglish

GLP Podcast Hosts

Listen to more episodes

News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.

Send this to a friend