Australia’s deregulation of gene edited foods moves forward despite organic industry opposition

image
Credit: Santatechseed

Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) has approved updated definitions for genetically modified (GM) food in the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code (the Code)…

Following a review under Proposal P1055, “Definitions for gene technology and new breeding techniques,” the GM definitions have been modernized to address advances in gene technologies and maintain strong food safety protections.

The new definition is based on the introduction of “novel DNA” in an organism or cells. Genetic changes that occur naturally or from conventional breeding will not be captured as GM. 

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

The FSANZ approval now moves to Australian and New Zealand food ministers, who have 60 days to consider FSANZ’s decision.

Some segments of the food industry oppose the updates. For example, trade group Australian Organic Ltd., which represents the Australian organic industry, is calling on state and federal food ministers to reflect the FSANZ decision, claiming that it would strip consumers of their right to know whether the food they eat has been genetically modified or gene edited. 

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Picture1
The FDA couldn’t find a vaccine safety crisis, so it buried its own research
Screenshot-2026-04-22-at-12.21.32-PM
Viewpoint: Why the retracted Monsanto glyphosate study doesn’t change the science—the world’s most popular herbicide is safe 
ChatGPT-Image-May-7-2026-12_32_36-PM
Viewpoint: The state of U.S. vaccine policy? Dismal nationally, but some states are stepping up.
placebo
Viewpoint — Alternative medicine and the placebo effect: Selling a reassuring illusion of health
_20250221_nib_rfk_trump
Viewpoint: 'Crisis of public trust': Autism support community shocked RFK continues to peddle false claims about the danger of vaccines
ChatGPT-Image-May-18-2026-01_45_05-PM-2
Newest hantavirus conspiracy: Online disinformation turns outbreak into latest ivermectin grift
ChatGPT-Image-May-18-2026-12_06_18-PM-2
Defying death: The immortality movement goes mainstream
Screenshot-2026-04-13-at-1.39.26-PM
Viewpoint: ‘Safer for children?’ Stonyfield yogurt under fire for deceptive organic marketing
Screenshot-2026-04-22-at-10.46.29-AM
Viewpoint: How to counter science disinformation? Science journalist offers 12 practical tips
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.