GMOs: “Frankenfood” or “better living through chemistry?”

GMO’s are a touchy topic, mostly because of the affiliations of the people who do the arguing.  People who have a say in the issue are usually locavores/environmentalists/foodies who place a lot of importance on food purity or people who like to defend industry and markets.

An ideological bloodbath usually ensues whenever they get down and dirty. So where does the truth lie?

This might be an unpopular opinion, but I think people who are highly skeptical of GMO’s are more or less in the wrong.  The opposition to GMO’s suffers from a poor understanding of what the technology is and isn’t, an underestimation of their benefits and the problems facing the global food supply, an underestimation of the feasibility and implementation costs of entirely organic farming, and they employ a biased risk assessment of GMO’s that makes them unnecessarily alarmist and causes them to mix up their devils.

View the original article here: GMOs: “Frankenfood” or “Better Living Through Chemistry?”

Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped
Infographic: The evolutionary history of the COVID-19 coronavirus

Infographic: The evolutionary history of the COVID-19 coronavirus

Reuters analysed over 185,000 genome samples from the Global Initiative on Sharing All influenza Data (GISAID), the largest database of ...

Environmental Working Group: EWG challenges safety of GMOs, food pesticide residues

Known by some as the "Environmental Worrying Group," EWG lobbies ...
m hansen

Michael Hansen: Architect of Consumers Union ongoing anti-GMO campaign

Michael K. Hansen (born 1956) is thought by critics to be ...
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
glp menu logo outlined

Newsletter Subscription

Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend