Can changes in gut microbiome help predict colorectal cancer risk?

Changes in the gut microbiome could help distinguish individuals with healthy colons from those with either colorectal adenomas (polyps with a risk of becoming cancer) or colorectal cancer, according to results of two recent studies.

In the first study, Patrick Schloss, Ph.D., and his colleagues at the University of Michigan analyzed and compared the microbial DNA found in stool samples from three groups of participants: healthy individuals, individuals with colorectal adenomas, and patients with colorectal cancer.

The researchers identified distinct gut microbiome signatures for each group. When combined with other known clinical risk factors for colorectal cancer (e.g. older age, African American and American Indian/Alaskan Native race, high body mass index), the microbiome signatures were better able than risk factors alone to distinguish individuals with healthy colons from those bearing adenomas and carcinomas.

If corroborated in a larger study population, the authors wrote, the results suggest that non-invasive analysis of the microorganisms in the digestive tract could complement existing screening methods for colorectal cancer.

In the second study, Peer Bork, Ph.D., of the European Molecular Biology Laboratory, and his colleagues utilized newer sequencing methods developed by the Human Microbiome Project to characterize microbial diversity in stool samples from patient groups from four different countries. As was the case in the first study, the researchers could distinguish people with colorectal cancer from healthy subjects based on differences in their microbiome.

Read full, original story: Analyzing the Gut Microbiome to Help Detect Colorectal Cancer

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-09-20-at-9.03.54-AM
From Malaysia to the world: A pioneering science communicator reimagines global science communication for a digital age
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-17-2026-12_28_43-PM
Vitamin D, omega-3 fish oil and glucosamine supplements could cause brain damage 
Screenshot-2026-08-12-at-11.31.46-AM
AI is helping develop new vaccines
Screenshot-2026-09-16-at-2.26.42-PM
Viewpoint: How to ecologically damage America’s forests: Ban glyphosate
Screenshot-2026-09-20-at-4.31.28-PM
White House drafting executive order to control what OMB Director Vought claims are “woke” NIH science grants
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-20-2026-04_22_32-PM
What’s Trump’s ‘AI Force’? Administration rushes to announce ill-defined watchdog and czar amid criticism of its resistance to curb AI acceleration
Screenshot-2026-08-19-at-6.19.42-PM
Facts & Fallacies podcast: 'Regenerative farming'? RFK Jr.’s federal push romanticizes the past and risks food security
Screenshot-2026-09-14-at-4.31.14-PM
Viewpoint: What’s the likely impact when the EPA loosens rules limiting methane pollution from oil and gas wells?
ChatGPT-Image-Aug-28-2026-03_33_46-PM
Viewpoint: Bad science—Five bogus Trump administration claims about vaccines and autism
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-20-2026-09_47_55-AM
Trump says he’ll require drugmakers to end multiple vaccine doses, reviving discredited autism claims
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-9-2026-02_48_24-PM
Viewpoint: Trump-RFK Jr. report on “Gender Ideology & Left-wing Ideology’ targets LGBTQ community—and science
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.