Trade complicates handling of GMO crops, GM labeling could, too

The use of biotechnology has made things more complicated for seed companies, grain handlers and farmers.

Charles Hurburgh, Iowa State University grain-handling specialist, says handling biotech and non-biotech commodity crops has gotten more complicated.

He says it is hard to keep a biotech trait out of the commodity grain handling system. Separate facilities are necessary. In addition, grain buyers have to be more aware of what traits are approved for import around the world.

The National Grain and Feed Association released a study showing U.S. corn farmers had $2.9 billion in economic losses due to the Viptera trait showing up in U.S. export shipments to China before it was approved.

The group also had a study showing U.S. growers could face up to $3.4 billion in economic losses during the marketing year with the Duracade trait, which has not been approved for import into China yet.

Hurburgh says those penalties for traits could come back to the farmer in the form of basis, storage or transportation costs.

That means there is more responsibility on the farmer’s part and at the first point of sale to make sure the GMO traits are properly channeled.

Hurburgh says GMO-labeling proposals will create more grain-handling issues, if they go into effect.

Food costs will likely go up 15-20 percent as many companies will likely reformulate their foods without corn and soybeans to make sure they don’t have GMO traits in them.

Read full, original article: Traits complicate grain handling, trade

Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped
Video: Test everyone – Slovakia goes its own way to control COVID

Video: Test everyone – Slovakia goes its own way to control COVID

As Europe sees record coronavirus cases and deaths, Slovakia is testing its entire adult population. WSJ's Drew Hinshaw explains how ...
mag insects image superjumbo v

Disaster interrupted: Which farming system better preserves insect populations: Organic or conventional?

A three-year run of fragmentary Armageddon-like studies had primed the journalism pumps and settled the media framing about the future ...
dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

The media call it the “Insect Apocalypse”. In the past three years, the phrase has become an accepted truth of ...
globalmethanebudget globalcarbonproject cropped x

Infographic: Cows cause climate change? Agriculture scientist says ‘belching bovines’ get too much blame

A recent interview by Caroline Stocks, a UK journalist who writes about food, agriculture and the environment, of air quality ...
organic hillside sweet corn x

Organic v conventional using GMOs: Which is the more sustainable farming?

Many consumers spend more for organic food to avoid genetically modified products in part because they believe that “industrial agriculture” ...
benjamin franklin x

Are most GMO safety studies funded by industry?

The assertion that biotech companies do the research and the government just signs off on it is false ...

Environmental Working Group: EWG challenges safety of GMOs, food pesticide residues

Known by some as the "Environmental Worrying Group," EWG lobbies for tighter GMO legislation and famously puts out annual "dirty dozen" list of fruits and ...
m hansen

Michael Hansen: Architect of Consumers Union ongoing anti-GMO campaign

Michael K. Hansen (born 1956) is thought by critics to be the prime mover behind the ongoing campaign against agricultural biotechnology at Consumer Reports. He is an ...
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend