Anti-GMO activists ‘harass’ Connecticut nature center months after Monsanto grant funds returned

A controversy that swirled last year when the Denison Pequotsepos Nature Center announced a grant from chemical giant Monsanto has led the nonprofit to revise its gifts policy and forgo a similar request this year, but the moves have failed to quell some activists’ angst over the matter.

Bob Burns of Ledyard, an organic farmer and nature center member, said he has gathered about 150 signatures on a petition demanding the nonprofit explicitly reject any “alliance” with Monsanto, whose genetically modified seeds have caused controversy among natural-food activists.

He added that if Denison Pequotsepos does not promise publicly to forgo any future grants from the chemical firm – whose Dekalb Genetics Corp. plant sits next to nature center property – he will lead a protest in front of the nonprofit’s property May 23 on World March Against Monsanto Day.

“This is a single issue,” Burns, who heads the local GMO Free CT chapter, said in a phone interview. “I’m going to stay on it till the … day I die.”

But nature center spokeswoman Elissa Bass said Burns’ insistence on conflating a donation as an alliance indicates the lengths he will go to hurt the organization.

“What Bob Burns is doing to the nature center is exactly what he says Monsanto does to the small American farmer,” Bass said in a phone interview. “He tries to bully us, and he tries to intimidate us.”

Burns and other activists opposed to genetically modified organisms in the nation’s food chain brought the issue to the public’s attention last fall after the Mystic River Press cited Monsanto’s $5,000 gift to fund a school program called “Plant & Pollinators: Perfect Partners” that teaches first graders about bees, butterflies and bats.

Meanwhile, a program that teaches kids about the importance of pollinators – even as honey bee populations worldwide have been decimated in recent years – will not be taught in the region’s schools this year.

Read full, original article: Nature center grant from Monsanto still rankles despite policy change

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.noReviewsLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-10-2026-12_21_03-PM
Viewpoint: Is there new evidence that the animal deworming drug ivermectin decreases the risk of Covid and cancer? Don’t waste your money.
Screenshot-2026-07-09-at-1.09.25-PM
Anti-vaccine myths rattle health care
Picture1
Hiroshima at 81: America’s new nuclear bomb, a buried Iranian target, and a question no one wants to ask
leeteam
How Kennedy and his family could pocket millions from Merck’s $50 million vaccine injury settlement that he oversaw
Screenshot-2026-07-30-at-3.07.42-PM
Controversy over WNBA star Sophie Cunningham’s comment opposing trans females in women’s sports reinvigorates the culture wars
Screenshot-2026-07-30-at-2.30.35-PM
Climate scientists claim conservative activists are promoting ‘lies’ that Europe’s summer heatwaves are far from unusual
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-25-2026-12_23_17-PM
No, Bill Gates did not secretly engineer ticks to promote veganism
ChatGPT Image Jul 29, 2026, 05_50_04 PM
Fear, science, and the law: If talc powder is unlikely to cause cancer and J&J was winning in court, why did it pay more than $5.5 billion to settle?

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.