Seattle Times: USDA’s GMO verification smarter than mandatory labeling

Many consumers want to know whether their food contains genetically modified ingredients, and some businesses are responding with the help of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA).

That’s as it should be — companies responding to market demand. Washington state voters rightly rejected a 2013 ballot measure requiring front-of-label “warnings” on food that contained genetically modified organisms (GMOs) — even though they are deemed safe by regulatory authorities, scientists and scholars. Completely unnecessary.

The Agriculture Department plans to start verifying companies’ claims that their products are free of those ingredients.

The voluntary program, which companies will pay to use, is a smart alternative to mandating labeling.

Related article:  Whole Foods sued for allegedly mislabeling GMO almonds as "non GMO"

Some companies use terms freely without any government oversight or verification, which is why the USDA developing protocols to certify non-GMO foods is welcome.

The Non-GMO Project, an organization that advocates for mandatory labeling, also offers a voluntary verification and labeling program.

Companies are smart to seek and pay for GMO bragging rights to cater to consumers who want those products. Let companies and consumers decide what labels are important to them.

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis. Read full, original post: Let market demand solve GMO labeling

Outbreak
Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped
Video: Test everyone – Slovakia goes its own way to control COVID

Video: Test everyone – Slovakia goes its own way to control COVID

As Europe sees record coronavirus cases and deaths, Slovakia is testing its entire adult population. WSJ's Drew Hinshaw explains how ...
mag insects image superjumbo v

Disaster interrupted: Which farming system better preserves insect populations: Organic or conventional?

A three-year run of fragmentary Armageddon-like studies had primed the journalism pumps and settled the media framing about the future ...
dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

The media call it the “Insect Apocalypse”. In the past three years, the phrase has become an accepted truth of ...
globalmethanebudget globalcarbonproject cropped x

Infographic: Cows cause climate change? Agriculture scientist says ‘belching bovines’ get too much blame

A recent interview by Caroline Stocks, a UK journalist who writes about food, agriculture and the environment, of air quality ...
organic hillside sweet corn x

Organic v conventional using GMOs: Which is the more sustainable farming?

Many consumers spend more for organic food to avoid genetically modified products in part because they believe that “industrial agriculture” ...
benjamin franklin x

Are most GMO safety studies funded by industry?

The assertion that biotech companies do the research and the government just signs off on it is false ...
favicon

Environmental Working Group: EWG challenges safety of GMOs, food pesticide residues

Known by some as the "Environmental Worrying Group," EWG lobbies for tighter GMO legislation and famously puts out annual "dirty dozen" list of fruits and ...
m hansen

Michael Hansen: Architect of Consumers Union ongoing anti-GMO campaign

Michael K. Hansen (born 1956) is thought by critics to be the prime mover behind the ongoing campaign against agricultural biotechnology at Consumer Reports. He is an ...
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend