Are concerns over danger of CRISPR eclipsing potential benefits?

CRISPR is causing a major upheaval in biomedical research. Unlike other gene-editing methods, it is cheap, quick and easy to use, and it has swept through labs around the world as a result. Researchers hope to use it to adjust human genes to eliminate diseases, create hardier plants, wipe out pathogens and much more besides. โ€œI’ve seen two huge developments since I’ve been in science: CRISPR and PCR,โ€ says John Schimenti, a geneticist at Cornell University in Ithaca, New York. Like PCR, the gene-amplification method that revolutionized genetic engineering after its invention in 1985, โ€œCRISPR is impacting the life sciences in so many ways,โ€ he says.

But although CRISPR has much to offer, some scientists are worried that the field’s breakneck pace leaves little time for addressing the ethical and safety concerns such experiments can raise.ย Some scientists want to see more studies that probe whether the technique generates stray and potentially risky genome edits; others worry that edited organisms could disrupt entire ecosystems.

โ€œThis power is so easily accessible by labs โ€” you don’t need a very expensive piece of equipment and people don’t need to get many years of training to do this,โ€ says Stanley Qi, a systems biologist at Stanford University in California. โ€œWe should think carefully about how we are going to use that power.โ€

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis. Read full, original post: CRISPR, the disruptor

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosateโ€”the world's most heavily-used herbicideโ€”pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-PM-24
Viewpoint: The herbicide glyphosate isnโ€™t perfect. Banning it would be far worse.
d-b
Blocked arteries, kidney stones, nausea, constipation, fatigue: Long list of health problems caused by too much vitamin Dย 
circular-bioeconomy-should-focus-on-sustainable-wellbeing
GLP podcast: What's wrong with 'doomsday' environmentalism? It's false.
Screenshot-2026-04-27-at-12.22.38-PM
Running โ€˜wildโ€™: Last year, RFK, Jr. was given a green light to โ€˜reformโ€™ chemical policies. Glyphosate illustrates how Trump now has him on a tight leash, and MAHA is furious
bayer-supremecourt-lt
EPA concludes glyphosate is not carcinogenic. Missouri courts say Monsanto failed to warn it might be. SCOTUS weighs in.
Screenshot 2026-02-25 at 11.20
Why the herbicide glyphosate is key to sustainable agriculture
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-22-2026-11_06_18-AM
Wellness influencer nonsense: No, nicotine does not boost cognition and productivity, but it can damage your healthย 
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.