Mutations that cause infertility detected through new genotyping strategy

Cornell researchers have developed an experimental strategy to identify infertility-causing mutations found in human populations. These mutations are known as single nucleotide polymorphisms, or SNPs, and are the most common type of genetic variation among people. Each SNP represents a difference in a single DNA building block, called a nucleotide.

“If we figure out whether a SNP is truly deleterious, then in the future when patients come in they can have their genomes sequenced to determine which SNPs they have. If we know which variation is good or bad, doctors will be able make a genetic diagnosis,” said John Schimenti, director of the Center for Vertebrate Genomics at Cornell and the paper’s senior author. Priti Singh, a postdoctoral fellow in Schimenti’s lab, is the first author of the study published Aug. 3 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The standard way to identify disease-causing SNPs involves comparing the genomes of healthy and affected people to narrow down their chromosomal locations, then using algorithms to predict which SNPs are harmful. But because fertility is such a complex process involving many genes, this method has not worked.

So Schimenti and Singh developed a new strategy: They took a list of all the known infertility genes in mice – which have been well-established through experimentation that cannot be done with humans – then computationally identified the equivalent SNPs in humans through databases of human genetic variation.

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis. Read full, original post: New strategy IDs infertility-causing genes

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Screenshot-2026-10-07-at-2.00.02-PM
9 wellness myths busted
AI Doctor with a Digital Neural Head
Utah becomes first state to empower AI to bypass doctors and prescribe certain drugs
Screenshot-2026-09-22-at-12.26.15-PM
‘Forever chemical’ concerns: Separating hysteria from reasonable concern in the debate over PFAS danger
Screenshot-2026-10-06-at-11.13.59-AM
RFK Jr.’s plan to curb America’s appetite for ultra-processed foods and artificial dyes blocked by the White House
Concerned-Farmer-at-Golden-Hour
GAHA: The corporate-created “healthier America” movement challenging what it claims is MAHA misinformation about modern farming, chemicals, and food
AI-Force-Uniform-Insignia-Close-Up
Trump wants an AI Force like Space Force, but that could make AI’s risks harder to manage
Screenshot-2026-10-08-at-2.32.00-PM
Abortion rights opponents outraged after FDA says its “safety review” of the already-found-safe mifepristone abortion pill will continue into 2027
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.