Do we have an intrinsic, evolutionary disgust of cockroaches?

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis.

Cockroaches have been smeared in the press for millennia. The ancient Egyptian “Book of the Dead” contains an insecticidal spell, and Pliny the Elder, in his “Natural History,” recommended that the “disgusting” pests be summarily squashed. According to Valerie Curtis, a professor at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine and the author of a recent book about the science of revulsion, the human tendency to recoil from cockroaches may have evolutionary underpinnings. Those of our ancestors who tended, even in the absence of the germ theory of disease, to steer clear of the things that cockroaches love most — bodily waste, spoiled foods, and so on — may have done “better, on average, in the reproduction lottery,” she said.

But Brent Karner, a former curator of entomology at the Los Angeles Natural History Museum, attributes humanity’s roach hatred not to an evolutionarily sensible disgust response but to a delusional and destructive detachment from nature. “In caves around the world, the ceiling is covered in bats and the floor is a moving mass of cockroaches and bat shit,” he said. “The roaches are cleaning that up so that the bats can continue to live there without pooping themselves out of house and home.” When our ancient ancestors first upgraded to cave living, the insects might have provided the same service, Karner suggested, and perhaps even been tolerated for it. Over time, however, as we settled into houses and domesticated a handful of favored animals, the cockroach became an unwelcome guest.

Read full, original post: In defense of the cockroach

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Picture1
The FDA couldn’t find a vaccine safety crisis, so it buried its own research
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-16-2026-02_56_53-PM
Financial incentives, over diagnosis, and weak oversight: Autism claims are driving up Medicare costs
Screenshot-2026-05-19-at-11.23.34-AM
West-originated vaccine disinformation sparks murders of health care workers across Africa
Screenshot-2026-04-22-at-12.21.32-PM
Viewpoint: Why the retracted Monsanto glyphosate study doesn’t change the science—the world’s most popular herbicide is safe 
Screenshot-2026-05-08-at-11.55.47-AM
Anti-vax activists falsely blame COVID vaccines for the rising U.S. cancer rate among younger people.
ChatGPT-Image-May-12-2026-11_27_01-AM-2
AI likely to improve health care, research shows—but not for blacks and ethnic minorities
ChatGPT-Image-May-7-2026-12_32_36-PM
Viewpoint: The state of U.S. vaccine policy? Dismal nationally, but some states are stepping up.
modi visit sikkim
Viewpoint: Indian PM wants farmers to switch to 50% organic. It would take at least 10 years, likely won’t work, and isn’t more sustainable
Screenshot-2026-05-18-at-12.57.12-PM
Viewpoint—‘Technology is pulling us apart’: Environmental, political, and economic
Screenshot-2026-04-13-at-1.39.26-PM
Viewpoint: ‘Safer for children?’ Stonyfield yogurt under fire for deceptive organic marketing
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.