Anti-vax activists falsely blame COVID vaccines for the rising U.S. cancer rate among younger people.

Credit: UC Davis
Credit: UC Davis

Websites and high-profile anti-vaccine activists are seizing on recently released U.S. government statistics showing a rise in cancers among young people to claim that COVID vaccines are responsible for the troubling trend.

On April 22, the National Cancer Institute released its most recent national cancer statistics, which cover the period between 2000 and 2023. The data indicate a rise in all cancers among people in the U.S. under 50, called “early-onset” cancers.

In seeking to connect the spike in cancer to COVID vaccines, some anti-vaxxers used the data to calculate that from 2021 to 2023 — a period during which COVID vaccines were widely available — the cancer rate increased by 6.37 percent.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

The increase in cancer rates cannot be linked to the rollout of COVID vaccines in the 2020s.

“There is no evidence that COVID-19 vaccines cause cancer, lead to recurrence, or lead to disease progression,” the National Cancer Institute states on its website. Indeed, the upward trends in cancer diagnoses predate COVID vaccines, which began to be rolled out in December 2020, the National Cancer Institute and other health authorities and experts have noted.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.noReviewsLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-25-2026-12_23_17-PM
No, Bill Gates did not secretly engineer ticks to promote veganism
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-22-2026-09_13_07-AM
Viewpoint—The Strategic Litigation boom: Understanding the tightening coalition among NGOs, foundations, journalists, and tort lawyers
ChatGPT-Image-May-22-2026-10_26_09-AM
Trump-RFK, Jr. National Science Board firings: Accountability vs. partisan meddling
How to Include More Strawberries in Your Diet
Strawberries are berries—and 35 other surprising food and drink myths
close up arabica coffee farmer s hands picking beans plant his farm colombia
Viewpoint: Why do so many ‘mainstream’ and ‘respected’ media outlets exaggerate climate change threats?
Screenshot 2026-07-11 094410
Growing animal muscle and fat cells inside rice grains and calling it beef: One of numerous genetically engineered products shaking up our ecosystem
diversity
We are entering a new era of personalized medicine—if you’re white
Screenshot-2026-07-07-at-12.55.44-PM
Viewpoint: Yes, we can adapt to a changing climate without devastating the environment and the economy

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.