Robot exoskeletons: Medical applications far ahead of military use

| August 20, 2015
Screen Shot at PM
This article or excerpt is included in the GLP’s daily curated selection of ideologically diverse news, opinion and analysis of biotechnology innovation.

Reading headlines about robot exoskeletons, or bionic suits, may evoke images of Sigourney Weaver using such a device against giant insectoid creatures in the 1980s science fiction classic Aliens. Or, you may recall a movie from last summer, Edge of Tomorrow, in which Tom Cruise donned such a suit as a futuruistic soldier.

Futuristic characters on the boundary between human and robot also have been central to the stories of RoboCop, the Terminators, Transformers and Iron Man. What all of these stories have in common is a lot of fighting, and the potential sci-fi-like military application is not crazy.

Today, both robot and exoskeleton technology have been advancing, largely through research supported by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). But when it comes to putting the technology to immediate, practical use, the battlefield is not the first setting where it will happen. Rather, the opposite is true; robotic technology, exoskeleton technology in particular is being applied medically, to give mobility to victims nervous system trauma.

Competing visions of our cyborg future

The word “cyborg” has come to mean an individual who is human, but with robotic or bionic replacement parts that have been integrated surgically with the rest of the body. A well-known extreme sci-fi example is the race called “the Borg“, on Star Trek. On Star Trek, people absorbed by the Borg became cyborgs by virtue of receiving numerous bionic implants. But they also became part of a collective Borg mind, because their brains were hijacked. Thinking of cyborgs, we may worry about this extreme Star Trek example, but a much different vision of human cyborgs –probably a much more realistic one– comes from Professor Yuval Noah Harari of Hebrew University. Based on the idea that bionic parts will eventually work better than the natural organs and limbs that they replace, Harari believes that many future humans will WANT to be cyborgs. As he explains:

I think it is likely in the next 200 years or so Homo sapiens will upgrade themselves into some idea of a divine being, either through biological manipulation or genetic engineering of by the creation of cyborgs, part organic part non-organic..We will be as different from today’s humans as chimps are now from us.

Initially, this may sound like Star Trek’s Borg race, but it’s nothing at all like that, because each cyborg would remain with his or her individual, creative mind. As with non-cyborg humans today, the cyborgs would have different opinions about politics, entertainment, sports, food, and everything else that we debate about today. But most people would not be cyborgs, because it will be very expensive. Thus, the scary, futuristic cyborg scenario is the opposite of Star Trek in that the cyborgs would be the lucky ones.

Crossing the cyborg threshold

Harari is able to envision such cyborg upper class emerging within two centuries, because robotic bionic technology is predicted to reach a point of functional superiority to whatever body part is being replaced. To get a feel for what this means, think of the character Steve Austin of the 1970s TV series The Six Million Dollar Man. Portrayed by Lee Majors, Austin was an astronaut turned secret agent, after losing both legs, and arm, and an eye in an accident. He was an effective agent against a string of bad guys, because his bionic replacement parts worked better than the natural parts. He could jump stories into the air, run faster than cars, throw things really far, and see like a telescope.

Today, bionic technology is progressing exponentially. Machine internal organs are only in the early stage. Thus, it’s too early to predict how many decades it will take before a mechanical heart or liver can take over as a long-term cure for an ailing organ. But, people are receiving bionic hands or legs, surgically implanted into the bone and integrated with their nervous systems so they can function as real limbs.Screen Shot 2015-08-19 at 8.48.31 PM

Related article:  Chimera alert? Myths and facts of human-non-human animal hybrids in medicine

Still, we are nowhere close to the threshold when those bionic hand, or other replacement limbs can match the performance of the part they replace, much less perform better to enhance humans. That’s the threshold that will be needed before people start electing to dump a perfectly good body part in favor of a robotic replacement. Also, since we’re talking about highly invasive surgery, the performance of the bionic part will probably have to be MUCH better compared with the natural part,

Glauco Ferrari, integrazione elettrica. Operatore esperto del "Body Extender"
Glauco Ferrari, integrazione elettrica. Operatore esperto del “Body Extender”

because of the risk of the same complications that people face when they opt for bone-invasive devices like artificial hips. That means a risk of infections, thromboses (blood clots), fat emboli, necrosis (tissue death) and osteolysis (loss of bone) around the implant, limb dislocation, and entry of little bits of metal into the tissues and circulation.

The risk of these complications is low, but it’s not zero, which means that operating on somebody who is undamaged is very bad medicine. Consequently, at least for the next few decades, it’s fairly certain that risk-benefit assessment will lead to the use of robotic replacement parts in cases when the original parts are injured, or damaged by disease, beyond repair.

Temporary cyborgs

There is an intermediate zone between robotic part replacement leaving an individual incapacitated. Unlike true bionic limbs, which will require surgical integration of the devices into bone and soft tissue as well as the nervous system (and the risk of complications that go along with that), an exoskeleton goes on the outside the body. It’s more like a mobility unit, or a high tech kind of clothing. DARPA may indeed be interested in eventual battlefield applications in which specially-trained soldiers will don the equipment for a specific mission. For the time being, exoskeletons are being used in victims of nervous system damage, such as strokes, and head and spinal injury.

With DARPA funding, a company called Exobionics is leading the way. With training from physical therapists, otherwise non-amulatory people are learning to use robot exoskeletons to get up from their wheelchairs occasionally for certain events, analogous to how President Franklin Roosevelt used special arm supports and leg braces to get up from his wheelchair and give a speech standing up. Ironically, as the technology develops, soldiers could be among those who use the technology, because of battle injuries. Rather than using the exoskeleton suit for a mission against international villains, they might don the suit for mobility at an office job, or, with increased sophistication as the technology develops, to dance at their child’s wedding.

They would take it off to go to sleep at night, so in a way their cyborg status would be part-time. Still, it will make a major difference in their lives. At the same time, in terms of the evolution of technology and its integration with humans, this will be a major step along the way. Perhaps, therefore, it’s time for Hollywood to make a feature film portraying exoskeleton technology –and for that matter biotechnology in general– for its ever-increasing non-military application, namely the improvement of the human condition.

David Warmflash is an astrobiologist, physician and science writer. Follow @CosmicEvolution to read what he is saying on Twitter.

The GLP featured this article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis. The viewpoint is the author’s own. The GLP’s goal is to stimulate constructive discourse on challenging science issues.

Outbreak
Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped
a a b b a f ac a

Video: Death by COVID: The projected grim toll in historical context

The latest statistics, as of July 10, show COVID-19-related deaths in U.S. are just under 1,000 per day nationally, which is ...
mag insects image superjumbo v

Disaster interrupted: Which farming system better preserves insect populations: Organic or conventional?

A three-year run of fragmentary Armageddon-like studies had primed the journalism pumps and settled the media framing about the future ...
dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

The media call it the “Insect Apocalypse”. In the past three years, the phrase has become an accepted truth of ...
types of oak trees

Infographic: Power of evolution? How oak trees came to dominate North American forests

Over the course of some 56 million years, oaks, which all belong to the genus Quercus, evolved from a single undifferentiated ...
biotechnology worker x

Can GMOs rescue threatened plants and crops?

Some scientists and ecologists argue that humans are in the midst of an "extinction crisis" — the sixth wave of ...
food globe x

Are GMOs necessary to feed the world?

Experts estimate that agricultural production needs to roughly double in the coming decades. How can that be achieved? ...
eating gmo corn on the cob x

Are GMOs safe?

In 2015, 15 scientists and activists issued a statement, "No Scientific consensus on GMO safety," in the journal Environmental Sciences ...
Screen Shot at PM

Charles Benbrook: Agricultural economist and consultant for the organic industry and anti-biotechnology advocacy groups

Independent scientists rip Benbrook's co-authored commentary in New England Journal calling for reassessment of dangers of all GMO crops and herbicides ...
Screen Shot at PM

ETC Group: ‘Extreme’ biotechnology critic campaigns against synthetic biology and other forms of ‘extreme genetic engineering’

The ETC Group is an international environmental non-governmental organization (NGO) based in Canada whose stated purpose is to monitor "the impact of emerging technologies and ...
Share via
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend