‘Ban bad capitalist behavior,’ not GMOs

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis.

The common cliché says one can’t put the genies of advancing science back into the bottles of undiscovery. And so it is with genetic modification. Once Francis Crick and James Watson, sitting in the Eagle Pub in Cambridge, had put together the idea that DNA was a double helix and had named its elements, the race to use the knowledge was on.

Ever since humans dabbled in agriculture we have played with genetic modification. Now we know and the technology to modify plants and species to do this or that exists and is being refined.

Nevertheless there are very many rational objections to genetic modification. One objection is that capitalist companies monopolise genetic technology, patent the high-yielding or parasite resistant seeds it produces and exploit the farmers who haplessly fall into the trap of cultivating their genetically modified (GM) crop. This is, on any reckoning, not a fault of the science but of capitalism and the rules and laws through which it is conducted. So ban bad capitalist behaviour, not GM crops which feed the starving and enrich the hitherto poor.

I have no doubt that the debate about the genetic modification in the vegetable world will continue without firm resolution for some time to come. There are convincing arguments on both sides which, putting pseudo-religious fervour for or against aside, should be decided on purely rational and scientific grounds.

Read full, original post: Ban bad capitalist, not GM crops

Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped
Video: Test everyone – Slovakia goes its own way to control COVID

Video: Test everyone – Slovakia goes its own way to control COVID

As Europe sees record coronavirus cases and deaths, Slovakia is testing its entire adult population. WSJ's Drew Hinshaw explains how ...
mag insects image superjumbo v

Disaster interrupted: Which farming system better preserves insect populations: Organic or conventional?

A three-year run of fragmentary Armageddon-like studies had primed the journalism pumps and settled the media framing about the future ...
dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

The media call it the “Insect Apocalypse”. In the past three years, the phrase has become an accepted truth of ...
globalmethanebudget globalcarbonproject cropped x

Infographic: Cows cause climate change? Agriculture scientist says ‘belching bovines’ get too much blame

A recent interview by Caroline Stocks, a UK journalist who writes about food, agriculture and the environment, of air quality ...
organic hillside sweet corn x

Organic v conventional using GMOs: Which is the more sustainable farming?

Many consumers spend more for organic food to avoid genetically modified products in part because they believe that “industrial agriculture” ...
benjamin franklin x

Are most GMO safety studies funded by industry?

The assertion that biotech companies do the research and the government just signs off on it is false ...

Environmental Working Group: EWG challenges safety of GMOs, food pesticide residues

Known by some as the "Environmental Worrying Group," EWG lobbies for tighter GMO legislation and famously puts out annual "dirty dozen" list of fruits and ...
m hansen

Michael Hansen: Architect of Consumers Union ongoing anti-GMO campaign

Michael K. Hansen (born 1956) is thought by critics to be the prime mover behind the ongoing campaign against agricultural biotechnology at Consumer Reports. He is an ...
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend