CRISPR patent dispute may finally be resolved

| | October 1, 2015
This article or excerpt is included in the GLP’s daily curated selection of ideologically diverse news, opinion and analysis of biotechnology innovation.

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis. 

Who owns the biggest biotech advance of the century? Geneticists in Boston may have found a way around a high-stakes patent dispute over one of the most significant biotechnology breakthroughs in recent years, a gene-editing tool called CRISPR.

CRISPR is faster, easier and cheaper than other gene editing techniques. It works in nearly everyone’s hands, democratising the pursuit of tweaking genes, which can be used for everything from breeding better plants to developing treatments for leukemia or HIV infections.

But the technology is embroiled in a patent dispute between researchers in California and Massachusetts.

Researchers Jennifer Doudna at the University of California in Berkeley and Emmanuelle Charpentier at the Max Planck Institute for Infection Biology in Berlin, Germany, filed the first patent on CRISPR, dated December 2012. But it was Feng Zhang at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard who was granted the patent, although he filed in October 2013. Zhang and the Broad Institute paid to expedite their patent and were the first to show that the tool works in human cells.

Now, Zhang has announced a potential way to resolve the dispute: his team has identified two novel DNA-slicing enzymes that aren’t covered by any of the previous patents and that can replace the one at the centre of the legal spat. Zhang’s team has used the enzymes to successfully edit human genomes. The discovery could potentially sidestep the patent dispute: it offers a different way to perform CRISPR gene editing.

Read full, original post: DNA-cutting enzymes could slice through gene editing patent spat

 

Outbreak
Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped
a a b b a f ac a

Video: Death by COVID: The projected grim toll in historical context

The latest statistics, as of July 10, show COVID-19-related deaths in U.S. are just under 1,000 per day nationally, which is ...
mag insects image superjumbo v

Disaster interrupted: Which farming system better preserves insect populations: Organic or conventional?

A three-year run of fragmentary Armageddon-like studies had primed the journalism pumps and settled the media framing about the future ...
dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

The media call it the “Insect Apocalypse”. In the past three years, the phrase has become an accepted truth of ...
types of oak trees

Infographic: Power of evolution? How oak trees came to dominate North American forests

Over the course of some 56 million years, oaks, which all belong to the genus Quercus, evolved from a single undifferentiated ...
biotechnology worker x

Can GMOs rescue threatened plants and crops?

Some scientists and ecologists argue that humans are in the midst of an "extinction crisis" — the sixth wave of ...
food globe x

Are GMOs necessary to feed the world?

Experts estimate that agricultural production needs to roughly double in the coming decades. How can that be achieved? ...
eating gmo corn on the cob x

Are GMOs safe?

In 2015, 15 scientists and activists issued a statement, "No Scientific consensus on GMO safety," in the journal Environmental Sciences ...
Screen Shot at PM

Charles Benbrook: Agricultural economist and consultant for the organic industry and anti-biotechnology advocacy groups

Independent scientists rip Benbrook's co-authored commentary in New England Journal calling for reassessment of dangers of all GMO crops and herbicides ...
Screen Shot at PM

ETC Group: ‘Extreme’ biotechnology critic campaigns against synthetic biology and other forms of ‘extreme genetic engineering’

The ETC Group is an international environmental non-governmental organization (NGO) based in Canada whose stated purpose is to monitor "the impact of emerging technologies and ...
Share via
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend