Kenyan government should allow science to guide GMO policy

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis.

Long-term pesticide and chemical misuse has harmed and continues to harm our environment. They have harmed the soils and killed pollinating insects, which are necessary for productivity of most of our cropping systems. The Bt-crops were designed as an answer to that. The Government, guided by basic scientific reality, can make up its mind to allow Kenyan farmers to embrace this now old technology for increased food security.

Quality seed varieties have always been bought or distributed by Governments. That is why we have Kenya Seed Company. Whereas the concern about germ plasm loss is genuine and that some of the indigenous crop varieties with useful traits could be lost, the answer lies in investing in research in biodiversity.

The Kenya Genetic Resources Institute should be capacitated to serve as a repository for plant, animal and microbial germ plasm for the country. Kenyans should also stop encroaching on biodiversity hotspots to avoid genetic erosion. The Government needs to invest the promised 2 per cent of the GDP in research to support more infrastructure and human capacity development in emerging sciences.

It will in future cost less than US$200 to sequence a genome. Most of the information about organisms will be housed in genome databases. We need an army of our young minds trained in science to be able to understand and harness this information to drive a bio-economy.

Scientists and the National Biosafety Authority must lay the facts as they are. Insect Resistant Maize varieties fortified with Bt-toxin and drought tolerance genes are safe. Chemical pesticides are unsafe to us and the environment, and we should reduce their use. Let us stop the fear mongering.

Read full, original post: Science should inform GMO debate

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.noReviewsLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Screenshot-2026-07-09-at-1.09.25-PM
Anti-vaccine myths rattle health care
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-25-2026-12_23_17-PM
No, Bill Gates did not secretly engineer ticks to promote veganism
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-10-2026-12_21_03-PM
Viewpoint: Is there new evidence that the animal deworming drug ivermectin decreases the risk of Covid and cancer? Don’t waste your money.
Picture1
Hiroshima at 81: America’s new nuclear bomb, a buried Iranian target, and a question no one wants to ask
leeteam
How Kennedy and his family could pocket millions from Merck’s $50 million vaccine injury settlement that he oversaw
ChatGPT Image Jul 29, 2026, 05_50_04 PM
Fear, science, and the law: If talc powder is unlikely to cause cancer and J&J was winning in court, why did it pay more than $5.5 billion to settle?

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.