GMO technology that saved Montana’s sugar beets now tarnishing their reputation

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis.

Montana’s sugar beet industry faces a serious challenge in public perception regarding the healthfulness of its product.

The sugar beet business would most likely not even be alive, today, in Yellowstone County, if it were not for the development of “Round-up” resistant beets, but anti-GMO public sentiment against that same technology now threatens the industry, according to Randal Jobman, Northern Agricultural manager for Western Sugar in Billings.

Prior to the introduction of Roundup resistant beets, the industry was in peril, said Jobman. With up and down years in terms of production, and with production costs running $1000 per acre, the future looked bleak. Much of that cost involved herbicide application, weeds that would have quickly succumbed to the chemical glyphosate, which is the ingredient in the commonly known brand name, Roundup. But glyphosate killed most sugar beet plants as well – but not all of them.

Then scientists were able to identify the gene in the stronger beet plants that enabled them to resist the glyphosate and were able to insert that gene into plants that lacked it. The results have been profound for the industry. “We are produced from the GMO process, but it is GMO free.”
“GMO beets have been around for thousands of years. We just learned how to replicate it,” said Jobman.

And the glyphosate resistant beets benefit the environment, according to Jobman. “We are applying five times less chemicals than we did before.” The amount of fuel needed and wear and tear on equipment – all are reduced. There is nothing wrong with non-GMO food products, said Jobman, “It’s just not better, and to spend more money on it is unwarranted.”

Read full, original post: Sugar Beet Industry Faces New GMO Challenge

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-05-01-at-1.29.41-PM
Viewpoint: What happens when whole grains meet modern food manufacturing? Labels don’t tell the whole story.
S
As vaccine rejectionism spreads, measles may be taking a more dangerous turn
Screenshot 2026-05-06 at 2.56
Singularity crisis ahead? Can super babies save us from rogue AI geniuses?
Screenshot-2026-05-06-at-2.07.43-PM
Manufacturing a conspiracy: The timeline of how  the White House embraced the fringe claim that scientists are being mysteriously murdered
Screenshot-2026-04-20-at-2.26.27-PM
Viewpoint — Food-fear world: The latest activist scientists campaign: Cancer-causing additives
Screenshot-2026-03-13-at-12.14.04-PM
The FDA wants to make many popular prescription drugs OTC—a great idea. Here’s why it’s unlikely to happen
Screenshot-2026-04-30-at-2.19.37-PM
5 myths about summer dehydration that could damage your health — or even kill you
ChatGPT-Image-May-6-2026-03_41_05-PM
‘Protecting the integrity of science’: Kennedy’s FDA blocks release of taxpayer-funded studies finding COVID and shingles vaccines safe
Screenshot-2026-05-01-at-11.56.24-AM
‘Science moves forward when people are willing to think differently’: Memories of DNA maverick Craig Venter
79d03212-2508-45d0-b427-8e9743ff6432
Viewpoint: The Casey Means hustle—Wellness woo opportunism dressed up as medical wisdom
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.