Can Dr. Oz rehabilitate image as haven for pseudoscience?

DrOzGMO

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis.ย 

Theย Federal Trade Commission had found that Oz’s producers did the scantest research on the show’s guests, which allowed modern-day snake oil salesmen to appear on air hawking bogus products. In April, a group ofย professors, scientists and doctors argued the show was so misleading that Oz’s professor position was incompatible with his on-air work.

But perhaps things were changing. This past summer, Oz had embarked on a “listening tour” with health professionals, in an attempt to understand how his brand of TV medicine affects public health โ€” and how he might do better.

In the past, Oz often promoted miracle supplements and fad foods. Now, in the shows I watched, he was focused more on debunking dubious products, explaining how science works, and urging informed consumerism among his viewers.

Read full, original post:ย Dr. Oz’s new season features more science and less bullshit

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosateโ€”the world's most heavily-used herbicideโ€”pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-04-12-135256
Bixonimania: The fake disease scam that AI swallowed whole

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.