Europe debating how to regulate emerging genome editing technology

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis.

EU policymakers are about to embark on a process which will go a long way to shaping the future of plant breeding in Europe – and whether EU farmers will be able to benefit from an emerging new technology.

After years of contemplation, the European Commission is expected to publish soon, possibly by the end of October, its opinion on how the relatively new technology, genome editing, should be classified and regulated.

This will kick-start a process which will eventually determine whether crops created by the technology, or at least strands of it, should be classified as genetically modified organisms (GMOs).

Genome editing involves inserting pieces of DNA, known as ‘molecular scissors’ into a host plant to cut and alter the genome of the host plant. In its simplest form, the technology deletes or alters existing genes without introducing new DNA.

Prof Huw Jones, of Rothamsted Research, Hertfordshire, said genome editing had the potential to revolutionise plant breeding in Europe, but only if policymakers treat it fairly.

He said: “If it is seen as a non-GMO, it will streamline the approval process and could change how plant breeding is done.

“If it is seen as a GMO…All the subsequent negativity surrounding GM would effectively prevent them being used in Europe.”

Penny Maplestone, chief executive of the British Society of Plant Breeders, said: “How the technology develops from here is completely dependent on what happens in the regulatory world.

The environmental lobby sees things differently. Various non-Governmental organisations have already joined forces to oppose the new technology and demand it is regulated as GM.

Read full, original post: GM or not GM? Why key decisions on new technology will shape EU plant breeding

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-04-13-at-3.54.04-PM
AI disinformation stress test: Challenges and response strategies
ChatGPT-Image-Feb-16-2026-01_04_32-PM
Raw milk myth wake-up call
Screenshot-2026-04-15-at-1.22.58-PM
Anti-biotechnology activists smear hybrid wheat breakthrough that could surge yields in poorer countries
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-11-2026-11_58_46-AM
The Trump administration has run out more than 4,000 National Institutes of Health employees. Here are the consequences
Screenshot-2026-04-14-at-12.51.09-PM
Public health advocates turn to influencers to fight online misinformation
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-17-2026-03_30_52-PM
Food labels, decoded: What they really mean
nutritional-food-heart-thumb-x-
Doctors needs nutrition classes? A physician unmasks another MAHA myth

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.