The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis.
There’s a good chance the word “natural” doesn’t mean what you think it does.
At least not when you find it on food packaging. A substantial chunk of the population has at least some misconceptions about what the term means on food labels, according to a recent survey by Consumer Reports.
Out of 1,005 respondents, 63 percent believed that the “natural” label meant a packaged food was produced without pesticides, 62 percent believed it meant the product contained no artificial ingredients, and 60 percent believed it meant a product was free of genetically modified organisms (GMO).
. . . .
In fact, the word has no official, legal definition in the United States. The FDA website explicitly states that the agency “has not developed a definition for the use of the term.”
Note that the current definition has nothing to do with pesticides, artificial growth hormones, GMOs or animal welfare.
And as Consumer Reports points out, there are plenty of products out there with the “natural” label that don’t seem to fit even the FDA’s informal definition.
But the lack of regulations around the “natural” label could change. In response to demands that the word have some official, formal meaning, the FDA is soliciting feedback from the public on what they think it should designate on food labels. Find out how to submit a comment here.
Read full, original post: People Are Totally Clueless About What ‘Natural’ Food Labels Mean