Gary Ruskin and Jon Entine tangle over the GMO corporate connection

Screen Shot at PM

What does it mean to have “corporate connections”?

The GLP has faced that question numerous times, as it is often accused by anti-GMO activists, particularly quack websites such as Mike Adams’ NaturalNews, as being a “front” for the crop biotechnology industry. In fact, 50 percent of GLP’s content and more than 60 percent of its funding focuses on human genetics. The GLP is transparent and posts all its funding sources: here; none of its funding comes from corporations or industry sources.

Nonetheless, GLP has been under attack, most recently by Gary Ruskin, co-founder of the US Right to Know (USRTK profiled by GLP here), which receives almost 100 percent of its funding from corporate or industry sources; its central funder, the Organic Consumers Association (OCA) represents many organic activists. But OCA also promotes many fringe beliefs that are contrary to consensus science and data including opposing vaccinations and suggesting that Ebola victims should treat their disease with homeopathic products instead of medicine.

Ruskin’s attacks prompted Corporate Crime Reporter — a Washington, DC based non-profit, which has been in existence for 30 years, and has co-authored articles with Ruskin — to run one of Ruskin’s attack pieces on the GLP’s Jon Entine. CCR’s founder, Russell Mokhiber, asked Entine if he’d like to respond, and Entine agreed.

The full commentary by Mokhiber and Entine’s response are only available in print form through Corporate Crime Reporter. A summary using selected quotes from Ruskin and Entine can be found at CCR’s website, here. CCR has allowed GLP to reproduce some of it here:


In March 2015, Ruskin filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request with UC Davis asking for any correspondence between Entine and a string of corporate interests, including Monsanto, Syngenta, Bayer, BASF, Dow, the Biotechnology Industry Organization, and the Grocery Manufacturers Association.

Ruskin wrote … to UC Davis Chancellor Linda Katehi asking her “reveal the sources of UC Davis funding for Jon Entine, the Genetic Literacy Project, the UC Davis Institute for Food and Agricultural Literacy, and its parent unit, the UC Davis World Food Center.”

“We are concerned that UC Davis may be acting as a financial conduit to enable corporations to direct third-party public relations attacks against targeted academics, individuals and institutions,” Ruskin wrote. “There is a significant body of evidence that Entine acts as a chemical industry public relations operative. Perhaps you are aware that he has written dozens of articles defending corporate interests, and attacking a range of targets whose work criticizes or detracts from the profit interests of the chemical and fossil fuel industries. … Alongside his role as senior fellow at the UC Davis Institute for Food and Agricultural Literacy, Entine is also executive director of the Genetic Literacy Project, which regularly attacks activists, journalists and scientists who raise concerns about the health and environmental risks of genetically engineered foods and pesticides.”

Related article:  Podcast with Dr. Paul Offit: Striking similarities between anti-biotech and anti-vaccine activism

Entine says Ruskin is engaged in a “juvenile witch hunt.”

“The irony is that the Genetic Literacy Project receives 97 percent of its funding — the rest via the Internet — from non-partisan foundations with no connection to the debate over GMOs, while Ruskin’s USRTK gets $274,500 from the Organic Consumers Association. Ruskin is a paid arm of one of the most extremist anti-science organizations in the US whose members directly benefit from the scare he can create around independent science.”

“And here’s the Alice in Wonderland world we live in,” Entine said. “We have a dramatic new technology called genetic engineering. It’s not risk free because nothing is. Research is expensive so governments are not in a position to take the lead on it. Corporations pursue research in this, costing hundreds of millions.”

“Reasonable regulations in place start getting distorted by anti-technology activists even though thirty years of research has shown an almost perfect record of safety and compliance. Smaller corporations drop out of development because it’s too expensive. Now anti-technology activists complain GE has been taken over by large corporations, because they could control the food supply. Governments begin developing smaller projects such as GE eggplant and wilt resistant banana and vitamin enhanced rice, with no corporate connections. They are condemned as Trojan Horses for Big Biotech. Food researchers develop inexpensive ways to tweak individual genes to stop browning in potatoes, apples and mushrooms. They are condemned as tools of the devil. A small company develops a sterile mosquito which could help prevent a Zika crisis, and the same brainiacs believe it should be stopped, because it’s part of a larger plot of corporate takeover of the world.”

For the rest of the summary, visit Corporate Crime Reporter here. For a full copy of Ruskin’s attack on Entine and Entine’s interview reply, contact CCR for a written copy.

Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped
ft covidresponseus feature

Video: Viewpoint: The US wrote the global playbook on the coronavirus and then ignored it

A year ago, the United States was regarded as the country best prepared for a pandemic. Our government had spent ...
mag insects image superjumbo v

Disaster interrupted: Which farming system better preserves insect populations: Organic or conventional?

A three-year run of fragmentary Armageddon-like studies had primed the journalism pumps and settled the media framing about the future ...
dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

The media call it the “Insect Apocalypse”. In the past three years, the phrase has become an accepted truth of ...
globalmethanebudget globalcarbonproject cropped x

Infographic: Cows cause climate change? Agriculture scientist says ‘belching bovines’ get too much blame

A recent interview by Caroline Stocks, a UK journalist who writes about food, agriculture and the environment, of air quality ...
organic hillside sweet corn x

Organic v conventional using GMOs: Which is the more sustainable farming?

Many consumers spend more for organic food to avoid genetically modified products in part because they believe that “industrial agriculture” ...
benjamin franklin x

Are most GMO safety studies funded by industry?

The assertion that biotech companies do the research and the government just signs off on it is false ...
gmo corn field x

Do GMO Bt (insect-resistant) crops pose a threat to human health or the environment?

Bt is a bacterium found organically in the soil. It is extremely effective in repelling or killing target insects but ...

Environmental Working Group: EWG challenges safety of GMOs, food pesticide residues

Known by some as the "Environmental Worrying Group," EWG lobbies for tighter GMO legislation and famously puts out annual "dirty dozen" list of fruits and ...
m hansen

Michael Hansen: Architect of Consumers Union ongoing anti-GMO campaign

Michael K. Hansen (born 1956) is thought by critics to be the prime mover behind the ongoing campaign against agricultural biotechnology at Consumer Reports. He is an ...
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend