Gene database promises greater accuracy to breast cancer risk assessment

cee d d z
A cluster of breast cancer cells (Credit: Annie Cavanagh. Wellcome Images [email protected] via Flickr)

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis.

Doctors can now give women with the BRCA1 and 2 genes a clearer genetic picture of their risk for developing ovarian and breast cancer by tapping a database that in its first year has helped scientists parse hundreds of genetic variations.

Researchers will announce the results of the initiative’s first year at the 6th International Biennial Meeting of Human Variome Project Consortium (HVP6) at UNESCO headquarters in Paris.

People who have the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes are at a higher risk for the cancers. Screening for the gene got worldwide attention in March 2015 when Angelina Jolie announced that she had the BRCA1 gene and had undergone surgery to remove her ovaries and fallopian tubes. Two years earlier, she opted for a preventive double mastectomy. Jolie’s mother died of ovarian cancer at 56.

The effort pools patients’ BRCA genetic data from public and private labs that join and become members of the database, which was founded by U.S.-based Quest Diagnostics and Inserm, a French public health institute. U.S.-based LabCorp was the first commercial participant.

Read full, original post: Breast cancer gene database gives clearer picture of risk

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-04-22-at-12.21.32-PM
Viewpoint: Why the retracted Monsanto glyphosate study doesn’t change the science—the world’s most popular herbicide is safe 
Picture1
The FDA couldn’t find a vaccine safety crisis, so it buried its own research
ChatGPT-Image-May-1-2026-11_42_59-AM-2
Viewpoint: NAD is the wellness grifters latest evidence-lite longevity fad. At least the mice are impressed.
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-16-2026-02_56_53-PM
Financial incentives, over diagnosis, and weak oversight: Autism claims are driving up Medicare costs
ChatGPT-Image-May-12-2026-11_27_01-AM-2
AI likely to improve health care, research shows—but not for blacks and ethnic minorities
ChatGPT-Image-May-7-2026-01_23_27-PM-2
Viewpoint: Will AI democratize personalized cancer treatment or fuel medical misinformation?
global warming
‘Implausible’: Top climate scientists reject worst-case scenario—soaring temperatures and fast-rising sea levels

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.