National Academies gene drive report ignores key policy issues

CRISP Genome Editing Geekswipe Res

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis.

If there is a prize for the fastest emerging tech controversy of the century the ‘gene drive’ may have just won it. In under eighteen months the concept of a ‘mutagenic chain reaction’ that can drive a genetic trait through an entire species became the subject of a US National Academy of Sciences high profile study, with a 216-page report. Previous technology controversies have taken from a decade to over a century to reach that level of policy attention. So why were Gene Drives fast-tracked to science academy report status?

Reading the final result, ‘Gene Drives on the Horizon,’ it appears that what drove the politics to get such a report published, that awesome and troubling political power that gene drives hold, is bizarrely underplayed. It’s not a bad report – it takes seriously the threat to biodiversity and warns strongly against environmental release.

Yet for all that, the NAS’s report fails to deliver a robust policy study because it ducks some of the most important questions.

Read full, original post: The National Academies’ Gene Drive study has ignored important and obvious issues

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}
screenshot at  pm

Are pesticide residues on food something to worry about?

In 1962, Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring drew attention to pesticides and their possible dangers to humans, birds, mammals and the ...
glp menu logo outlined

Newsletter Subscription

* indicates required
Email Lists
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.