On USDA decisions to allow CRISPR-edited crops to forego additional regulation

Screen Shot at PM

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis.

The first CRISPR-edited crops . . . can be cultivated and sold without oversight by the USDA, the agency said in a pair of letters posted in April. The decisions could reduce by millions the cost of development of the crops. . . .

. . . .

Such letters from USDA have become “essential” to small companies attempting to bring to market GE plants, says Antony Evans, CEO of . . . TAXA Biotechnologies. . . . “If you don’t get a letter like that, it’s very hard to…raise any money” because investors are leery of . . . the cost-prohibitive regulatory process, he says.

. . . .

In an effort to catch up with technology, the White House has ordered the USDA, the FDA and the EPA to update. . . the Coordinated Framework for the Regulation of Biotechnology. . . .

The agencies enlisted help from a committee convened by the US National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine. The committee will attempt to predict “the likely future products of biotech . . .” and what types of risks those products might pose. . . The group . . . plans to publish a report by the end of 2016.

The full, original article is behind a paywall, Nature subscribers can read it here. Non-subscribers can purchase the article: CRISPR-edited crops free to enter market, skip regulation

Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped

Video: We can ‘finally’ grow GMOs—Nigerian farmer explains why developing countries need biotech crops

Nigerian farmer Patience Koku discusses the GMO crop trials she is conducting on her farm, and why growers can "rise ...
mag insects image superjumbo v

Disaster interrupted: Which farming system better preserves insect populations: Organic or conventional?

A three-year run of fragmentary Armageddon-like studies had primed the journalism pumps and settled the media framing about the future ...
dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

The media call it the “Insect Apocalypse”. In the past three years, the phrase has become an accepted truth of ...
breastfeeding bed x facebook x

Infographic: We know breastfeeding helps children. Now we know it helps mothers too

When a woman becomes pregnant, her risk of type 2 diabetes increases for the rest of her life, perhaps because ...
organic hillside sweet corn x

Organic v conventional using GMOs: Which is the more sustainable farming?

Many consumers spend more for organic food to avoid genetically modified products in part because they believe that “industrial agriculture” ...
benjamin franklin x

Are most GMO safety studies funded by industry?

The assertion that biotech companies do the research and the government just signs off on it is false ...
gmo corn field x

Do GMO Bt (insect-resistant) crops pose a threat to human health or the environment?

Bt is a bacterium found organically in the soil. It is extremely effective in repelling or killing target insects but ...

Environmental Working Group: EWG challenges safety of GMOs, food pesticide residues

Known by some as the "Environmental Worrying Group," EWG lobbies for tighter GMO legislation and famously puts out annual "dirty dozen" list of fruits and ...
m hansen

Michael Hansen: Architect of Consumers Union ongoing anti-GMO campaign

Michael K. Hansen (born 1956) is thought by critics to be the prime mover behind the ongoing campaign against agricultural biotechnology at Consumer Reports. He is an ...
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend