Environmental Working Group does not support Senate’s GMO labeling bill

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis.

For a variety of reasons, EWG does not support the Roberts-Stabenow legislation . . .

. . . .

While the Roberts-Stabenow bill imposes a federal mandate to label genetically engineered food, it lacks many elements of the national GMO labeling system that EWG has fought for at the state and federal levels. . . .


In particular, the USDA may define­­ – potentially too narrowly – the types of biotechnologies that will be subject to the labeling requirement. The USDA will also establish the threshold amount of GMO-derived ingredients that will mandate labeling. The department is also given discretion to determine how to hold companies accountable if they fail to label.

Related article:  Viewpoint: Unlikely alliance between environmentalists, farmers and big ag companies aims to improve soil health

. . . .

At the same time, senators eliminated many of the worst features food and agriculture interests sought for the legislation. . . .GMO labeling will be mandatory. . . QR codes will only have to appear on GMO foods. . . Once a consumer scans the code, the GMO disclosure must be prominent on the first product information page.

. . . [T]he bill also contains important protections for organic food and farming. . . .


Read full, original post: Will GMO Labeling ‘Win’ Be Undermined by Loopholes?

Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
GLP Podcasts
Infographic: Deaths from COVID-19 are far higher than reported estimates

Infographic: Deaths from COVID-19 are far higher than reported estimates

More than 2.8 million people have lost their lives due to the pandemic, according to a Wall Street Journal analysis ...
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
glp menu logo outlined

Newsletter Subscription

Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend