South Korea debates GMO labeling requirements

Screen Shot at PM

Seoul Metropolitan Government launched South Korea’s first “zero-GMO markets” in Sept. 2015. It was a plan to sell only non-genetically modified agricultural, fishing, and livestock products and processed foods . . .

A year later, those markets are in danger of losing their “zero-GMO” signboards. In April, the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) issued an administrative notice of plans to amend some of the labeling standards for GMO food products. Included in them were provisions that would prevent the use of the term “non-GMO” on agricultural products and processed foods not subject to GMO labeling.

. . . .

. . . .“If the amendment does go into effect, we plan to take down the signs advertising them as ‘zero-GMO markets,’” [said a city government official.]

Consumer co-ops and civic groups were up in arms over the plan, arguing that consumers “have a right to know” about GMOs. Thirty lawmakers. . . sponsored an amendment to the Food Sanitation Act in June that would beef up full GMO labeling requirements.

. . . .

. . . .“As of now, nothing has been decided,” [said a ministry official.]

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis. Read full, original post: Seoul’s “zero-GMO” markets in danger of losing their signboards

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-27-2026-11_47_30-AM-2
FDA’s expedited drug reviews are hailed in some quarters but other approval practices are problematic
Farmers can talk to plants
Farmers are a major source of misinformation—about farming
Screenshot-2026-05-01-at-1.29.41-PM
Viewpoint: What happens when whole grains meet modern food manufacturing? Labels don’t tell the whole story.
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-13-2026-02_20_22-PM
Viewpoint: Misinformation infodemic? Why assessing evidence is so challenging 
S
As vaccine rejectionism spreads, measles may be taking a more dangerous turn
Screenshot 2026-05-06 at 2.19
Vaccine shootout at the CDC 
What explains Homo sapiens’ huge brains? Ancient climate change played a role
Viewpoint: Internal White House documents detail administration’s strategy to undermine climate science
ChatGPT-Image-May-7-2026-11_28_04-AM-2
‘Conflict entrepreneurs’ are driving disinformation and shaping public opinion
Screenshot-2026-04-20-at-2.26.27-PM
Viewpoint — Food-fear world: The latest activist scientists campaign: Cancer-causing additives
ChatGPT-Image-May-6-2026-03_41_05-PM
‘Protecting the integrity of science’: Kennedy’s FDA blocks release of taxpayer-funded studies finding COVID and shingles vaccines safe
bigstock opioids on chalkboard with rol
GLP podcast: 'Safe injection sites': enabling drug addiction or saving lives?
Screenshot-2026-05-06-at-2.07.43-PM
Manufacturing a conspiracy: The timeline of how  the White House embraced the fringe claim that scientists are being mysteriously murdered
circular-bioeconomy-should-focus-on-sustainable-wellbeing
GLP podcast: What's wrong with 'doomsday' environmentalism? It's false.
Screenshot 2026-05-06 at 12.49
Immortal dragons: The quest to ‘make death optional’
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.